Discover
/
Article

The feasibility of inertial‐confinement fusion

SEP 01, 1982
Fusion scientists are encouraged by recent experiments demonstrating the efficient coupling of laser light to targets and new ideas for economically competitive power plants.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2915258

John H. Nuckolls

So concluded the chairman of a Department of Energy ad hoc committee of experts in 1979, after a comprehensive review of the US inertial‐confinement fusion program. In spite of this positive evaluation, the role of inertial‐confinement fusion in the total US energy program continues to be a subject of disagreement. Before I mention the issues of contention, let me describe inertial‐confinement fusion briefly. In a typical scheme, a pea‐sized target pellet containing hydrogen isotopes is projected into a reactor chamber, where it is suddenly irradiated with an intense beam of light or ions from a “driver” (see figure 1). As the surface of the target blasts away, the rocket‐like reaction forces implode the target’s interior to densities and temperatures sufficient to cause the hydrogen nuclei to fuse, releasing an amount of energy equivalent to that of a barrel of oil (see PHYSICS TODAY, August 1973, page 46).

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. S. Foster Jr, “The Promise of ICF Power,” AAAS annual meeting, San Francisco, January 1980.

  2. 2. W. D. Metz, Science 212, 517 (1981).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  3. 3. W. C. Mead et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 18 (1981).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  4. 4. W. Seka et al., Optics Comm. 40, 437 (1982);
    N. G. Basov et al., Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 2, 429 (1973); https://doi.org/SJQEAF
    C. Garban‐Labaunc et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1018 (1982); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    D. C. Slater et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 18 (1981).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  5. 5. C. E. Max, K. G. Estabrook, Comments Plasma Phys. 5, 239 (1980).

  6. 6. M. Monsler et al., Nuclear Technology/Fusion 1, 302 (1981).

  7. 7. B. Badger, et al., HIBALL, report number UWFDM‐450/KfK‐3202, U. of Wisconsin (1981).

  8. 8. Nat. Acad. Sci., Energy in Transition 1985–2000, Freeman, San Francisco (1980).

  9. 9. R. W. Conn et al., Report number UWFDM‐220, U. of Wisconsin (1977).

  10. 10. M. I. Budyko, Meteorologiya I Gidrologiya No. 2 (1974).

  11. 11. J. Hansen et al., Science 213, 957 (1981).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  12. 12. A. Weinberg, Science 82, May 1982, page 16.

  13. 13. J. Maniscalco et al., “The Fusion Fuel Factory–An Early Application of Nuclear Fusion That Makes Sense,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report number UCRL‐87801 (1982).

  14. 14. J. Anderer, W. Häfele, et al., IIASA, Energy in a Finite World, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass. (1981).

More about the Authors

John H. Nuckolls. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.

Related content
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
/
Article
Bottom-up self-assembly is a powerful approach to engineering at small scales. Special strategies are needed to formulate components that assemble into predetermined shapes with precise sizes.
/
Article
The polymath scientist leaves behind a monumental legacy in both the scientific and political realms.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1982_09.jpeg

Volume 35, Number 9

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.