Discover
/
Article

Solid‐state plasma

NOV 01, 1965

DOI: 10.1063/1.3046991

A. G. Chynoweth
S. J. Buchsbaum

Some twenty years ago Ruthemann and Lang shot a monoenergetic beam of electrons in the keV range through a thin foil of aluminum and measured the energy distribution of the emergent electrons. They noticed that while most of the beam penetrated the metal without an appreciable loss of energy, there was a distinct group of electrons which lost very nearly 15 eV. When a different metal was substituted for aluminum, the same phenomenon was observed except that the characteristic energy loss differed from metal to metal. The explanation of this effect was not long in coming. Some of the electrons lost a certain definite amount of energy by exciting longitudinal plasma oscillations inside the metal at a frequency ωp characteristic of the particular metal. This cost the electron a “quantum” of energy ωp, where ℏ is Planck’s constant; Pines called this quantum the “plasmon”. The experiment, and the Bohm and Pines theory of it, marked the beginning of research into the properties of solid‐state plasmas.

References

  1. 1. G. Ruthemann, Ann. Phys. 2, 113 (1948).https://doi.org/ANPYA2

  2. 2. W. Lang, Optik 3, 233 (1948).

  3. 3. D. Pines and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 83, 221 (1951); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    D. Pines and D. Bohm, 85, 338 (1952).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.

  4. 4. D. Pines, Revs. Modern Phys. 28, 184 (1956).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  5. 5. Proceedings of the Symposium on Plasma Effects in Solids, Paris, 1964, J. Bok, ed. (Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1965).

  6. 6. R. D. Larrabee and M. C. Steele, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1519 (1961); https://doi.org/JAPIAU
    M. Glicksman, Phys. Rev. 124, 1655 (1961); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    C. E. Hurwitz and A. L. McWhorter, Phys. Rev. 134, A1033 (1964).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  7. 7. B. B. Kadomtsev and A. V. Nedospasov, J. Nucl. Energy C1, 230 (1960).https://doi.org/JNCEAA

  8. 8. M. Glicksman and M. C. Steele, Phys. Rev. Letters 2, 461 (1959); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    A. G. Chynoweth and A. A. Murray, Phys. Rev. 123, 515 (1961); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    M. Glicksman and R. A. Powlus, Phys. Rev. 129, 1572 (1963).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  9. 9. B. D. Osipov and A. N. Khvishchev, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 43, 1179 (1962); https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    B. D. Osipov and A. N. Khvishchev, Soviet Phys.‐JETP 16, 833 (1962); https://doi.org/SPHJAR
    B. Ancker‐Johnson and J. E. Drummond, Phys. Rev. 131, 1961 (1963); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    B. Ancker‐Johnson and J. E. Drummond, Phys. Rev. 132, 2372 (1963).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  10. 10. B. Ancker‐Johnson and M. F. Berg in, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Physics of Semiconductors, Paris 1964, (Dunod, Paris, 1964), p. 513.

  11. 11. Y. T. Baiborodov, M. S. Ioffe, V. M. Petrov, and R. I. Sobolev, J. Nucl. Energy C5, 409 (1963).https://doi.org/JNCEAA

  12. 12. H. P. Furth and M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Fluids 7, 764 (1963).https://doi.org/PFLDAS

  13. 13. J. B. Taylor, Phys. Fluids 6, 1529 (1963).https://doi.org/PFLDAS

  14. 14. M. Ya. Azbel’, Zh. Eksperim. i. Teor. Fiz. 39, 1138 (1960); https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    M. Ya. Azbel’, Soviet Phys.‐JETP 12, 793 (1961).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  15. 15. P. M. Platzman and K. C. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. 134, A974 (1963).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  16. 16. R. W. Stark (private communication).

  17. 17. S. J. Buchsbaum and P. A. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 406 (1965). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    C. C. Grimes, G. Adams and P. H. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 409 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  18. 18. L. C. Hebel and P. A. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 369 (1963); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    L. C. Hebel, reference 5, p. 117.

  19. 19. G. A. Williams and G. E. Smith, I.B.M. J. Res. Devel. 8, 276 (1964).https://doi.org/IBMJAE

  20. 20. See, for example, B. Lax and J. G. Mavroides, Solid State Physics (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1960) Vol. II, p. 261;
    R. E. Michel and B. Rosenblum, Phys. Rev. 128, 1646 (1962); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    G. E. Smith, I. C. Hebel and S. J. Buchsbaum, Phys. Rev. 129, 154 (1963).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  21. 21. W. P. Allis. S. J. Buchsbaum and A. Bers, Waves in Anisotropic Plasma (The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts. 1963);
    T. H. Stix, The Theory of Plasma Waves (McGraw‐Hill Book Co., Inc., New York. 1962).

  22. 22. H. Alfvén, Cosmical Electrodynamics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950), Chapter 4.

  23. 23. S. J. Buchsbaum and J. K. Galt, Phys. Fluids 4, 1514 (1961); https://doi.org/PFLDAS
    G. A. Williams, Phys. Rev. 139, A771 (1965); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    M. A. Khaikin, V. S. Edelmann and R. T. Mina, Zh. Eksp. i. Teor. Fiz. 44, 2190 (1963);
    M. A. Khaikin, V. S. Edelmann and R. T. Mina, 45, 1704 (1963)
    (translation M. A. Khaikin, V. S. Edelmann and R. T. Mina, Soviet Phys.‐JETP 17, 1470 (1963); https://doi.org/SPHJAR
    M. A. Khaikin, V. S. Edelmann and R. T. Mina, 18, 1167 (1964); https://doi.org/SPHJAR , Sov. Phys. JETP
    B. W. Faughnan, J. Phys. Soc. (Japan) 20, 574 (1965).https://doi.org/JUPSAU

  24. 24. G. A. Williams, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 9, 353 (1963).https://doi.org/BAPSA6

  25. 25. M. Surma, J. K. Furdyna, and H. Praddaude, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 710 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  26. 26. P. Aigrain in, Proceedings of the International Conference on Semiconductor Physics, Prague, 1960 (Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 1961) p. 224.

  27. 27. R. Bowers, C. Legendy and F. Rose, Phys. Rev. Letters 7, 339 (1961); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    A. Libthaber and R. Veilex, Phys. Rev. 127, 774 (1962).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  28. 28. Y. Sawada, E. Burstein, D. L. Carter, L. Testardi, reference 5, p. 71.

  29. 29. M. T. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 497 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    M. T. Taylor, Phys. Rev. 137, A1145 (1965); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. Kirsch and P. B. Miller, Phys. Rev. Letters 9, 421 (1962); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    J. Kirsch and P. B. Miller, Phys. Rev. 133, A1390 (1964).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  30. 30. E. A. Stern, Phys. Rev. Letters 10, 91 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  31. 31. E. Kaner and V. G. Skobov, Zh. Eksperim. i. Teor. Fiz. 45, 610 (1963); https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    E. Kaner and V. G. Skobov, Soviet Phys.‐JETP 18, 419 (1964).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  32. 32. J. J. Quinn, Phys. Letters 7, 235 (1963); https://doi.org/PHLTAM
    P. B. Miller, Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 537 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  33. 33. C. C. Grimes, reference 5, p. 87;
    D. A. Hays and W. L. McLean, Phys. Letters 17, 215 (1965).https://doi.org/PHLTAM

  34. 34. C. C. Grimes (private communication).

  35. 35. C. C. Grimes and S. J. Buchsbaum, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 356 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    for theory of helicon wave‐phonon coupling, see G. A. Akramov, Soviet Phys.‐Solid State 5, 595 (1963); https://doi.org/SPSSA7
    J. J. Quinn and S. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. 133, A1589 (1964); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    D. N. Langenberg and J. Bok, Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 549 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  36. 36. C. C. Grimes, reference 5, p. 87.

  37. 37. E. A. Stern and E. Callen, Phys. Rev. 131, 512 (1963).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  38. 38. R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. 111, 1214 (1958); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    C. J. Powell and J. B. Swan, Phys. Rev. 118, 640 (1960); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. L. Robbins, P. E. Best, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 79, 110 (1962); https://doi.org/PPSOAU
    C. Kunz, Z. Physik 167, 53 (1962); https://doi.org/ZEPYAA
    R. J. Herichoff, W. F. Hanson, R. D. Birkhoff, E. T. Arakawa, Phys. Rev. 139, A1455 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  39. 39. D. Pines and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 124, 1387 (1961).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  40. 40. S. Ichimaru, D. Pines, N. Rostoker, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 231 (1962); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    P. M. Platzman, Phys. Rev. 139, A379 (1965); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    A. L. McWhorter in, Proceedings of the Quantum Electronics Conference, San Juan, 1965 (to be published).

  41. 41. J. Gremillet, Ann. Radioelect. 19, 232 (1964).https://doi.org/ANRDAH

  42. 42. R. Bowers (private communication).

  43. 43. J. Bok and P. Nozieres, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 709 (1963).https://doi.org/JPCSAW

  44. 44. T. Misawa, J. Appl. Phys. (Japan) 2, 500 (1963);
    R. J. Briggs, Electron Stream Interaction with Plasmas (The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, 1964), p. 81.

  45. 45. D. J. Bartelink, to be published.

  46. 46. G. A. Baraff and S. J. Buchsbaum, Appl. Phys. Letters 6, 219 (1965).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  47. 47. C. R. Legendy, Phys. Rev. 135, A1713 (1964); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. M. Goodman, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 10, 110 (1965); https://doi.org/BAPSA6
    G. N. Harding, P. C. Thonemann, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 85, 317 (1965).https://doi.org/PPSOAU

  48. 48. J. B. Gunn, I.B.M. J. Res. Devel. 8, 141 (1964); https://doi.org/IBMJAE
    and reference 5, p. 199.

  49. 49. A. R. Hutson, A. Jayaraman, A. G. Chynoweth, A. S. Coriell, and W. L. Feldmann, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 639 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  50. 50. R. D. Larrabee and W. A. Higinbothem, reference 5, p. 181.

  51. 51. S. J. Buchsbaum, A. G. Chynoweth, and W. L. Feldmann, Appl. Phys. Letters 6, 67 (1965).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  52. 52. P. A. Wolff, Physics 1, 147 (1964).

More about the Authors

A. G. Chynoweth. Bell Telephone Laboratories.

S. J. Buchsbaum. Electronic Research Laboratory, Murray Hill.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1965_11.jpeg

Volume 18, Number 11

Related content
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.
/
Article
Positron emission tomography’s ability to image the body’s biochemistry, not just its anatomy, makes it a powerful tool for detecting diseases.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.