Discover
/
Article

Nucleon–nucleon scattering

DEC 01, 1969
An atomic nucleus can be considered a set of two‐nucleon systems. What are the forces between these pairs? How do protons and neutrons differ and how are they similar? Studies during the past three decades have given some answers and indicated which new kinds of experiments are likely to be most useful.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3035291

Malcolm H. Mac Gregor

DETERMINATION OF THE fundamental law of force between two nucleons has occupied many physicists for the past three decades. Because the proton and electron have obvious similarities (elementarily, spin of 1/2, equal‐but opposite electric charge, Fermi statistics, antiparticles) the derivation of a nuclear “Coulomb’s law” would seem to be a just reward for working in this area. As we have rather slowly and laboriously learned, however, simplicity appears to be inversely proportional to some power of the coupling constant.

References

  1. 1. I. Curie‐Joliot, F. Joliot, Compt. Rend. 194, 273 (1932); https://doi.org/COREAF
    J. Chadwick, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A136, 692 (1932).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  2. 2. J. D. Cockcroft, E. T. S. Walton, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A136, 619 (1932).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  3. 3. E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 43, 252 (1933).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. W. Heisenberg, Z. Physik 77, 1 (1932).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  5. 5. E. Majorana, Z. Physik 82, 137 (1933).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  6. 6. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys.‐Math. Soc. (Japan) 17, 48 (1935).

  7. 7. H. A. Bethe, R. F. Bacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 8, 193 (1936).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  8. 8. J. M. B. Kellogg, I. I. Rabi, N. F. Ramsey, Jr, J. R. Zacharias, Phys. Rev. 55, 318 (1939); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. M. B. Kellogg, I. I. Rabi, N. F. Ramsey, Jr, J. R. Zacharias, 56, 728 (1939).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.

  9. 9. K. M. Case, A. Pais, Phys. Rev. 80, 203 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  10. 10. G. Breit, E. Feenberg, Phys. Rev. 50, 850 (1936).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  11. 11. R. E. Seamon, K. A. Friedman, G. Breit, R. D. Haracz, J. M. Holt, A. Prakash, Phys. Rev. 165, 1579 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  12. 12. L. Puzikov, R. Ryndin, J. Smorodinskij, Nuclear Physics 3, 436 (1957).

  13. 13. M. H. Mac Gregor, R. A. Arndt, A. A. Dubow, Phys. Rev. 135, B628 (1964).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  14. 14. M. Hull, K. Lassila, H. Ruppel, F. McDonald, G. Breit, Phys. Rev. 122, 1606 (1961); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    M. H. Mac Gregor, Phys. Rev. 123, 2154 (1961).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  15. 15. I. Slaus, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 575 (1967).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  16. 16. R. J. N. Phillips, Nucleon–Nucleon Scattering Experiments, Harwell report AERE‐R3141 (1960).

  17. 17. H. P. Stapp, T. Ypsilantis, N. Metropolis, Phys. Rev. 105, 302 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  18. 18. G. Breit et al., Phys. Rev. 128, 826 and (1962).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  19. 19. R. A. Arndt, M. H. Mac Gregor, Phys. Rev. 141, 873 (1966); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    R. A. Arndt, M. H. Mac Gregor, Methods in Computational Physics, vol. 6, Academic Press (1966).

  20. 20. P. Signell, N. R. Yoder, N. M. Miskovsky, Phys. Rev. 133, B1495 (1964).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  21. 21. E. Clementel, C. Villi, Nuovo Cimento [10] 2, 1165 (1965).https://doi.org/NUCIAD

  22. 22. H. P. Noyes, M. H. Mac Gregor, Phys. Rev. 111, 223 (1958); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    M. H. Mac Gregor, Phys. Rev. 113, 1559 (1959).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  23. 23. O. Chamberlain, E. Segrè, R. D. Tripp, C. Wiegand, T. Ypsilantis, Phys. Rev. 105, 288 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  24. 24. Prog. Theoret. Phys., Supplement 3, (Kyoto) (1956).

  25. 25. P. Cziffra, M. H. Mac Gregor, M. J. Moravcsik, H. P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. 114, 880 (1959).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  26. 26. A. F. Grashin, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 9, 1223 (1959).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  27. 27. M. H. Mac Gregor, M. J. Moravcsik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 524 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  28. 28. Reported at the London “Few Nucleon Conference,” 1959.

  29. 29. H. P. Stapp, H. P. Noyes, M. J. Moravcsik, Proceedings of the 1960 High Energy Conferences at Rochester, p. 128;
    Proceedings of the 1962 High Energy Conferences at CERN, p. 131.

  30. 30. M. H. Mac Gregor, R. A. Arndt, R. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. 182, 1714 (1969).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  31. 31. M. H. Mac Gregor, R. A. Arndt, R. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. 182, 1714 (1969).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  32. 32. M. H. Mac Gregor, R. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. 173, 1272 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  33. 33. M. H. Mac Gregor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 403 (1964).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  34. 34. G. Breit, R. D. Haracz, High Energy Physics, (E. H. S. Burhop, ed.) vol. 1, p. 21, Academic Press Inc., New York, (1967).

  35. 35. L. N. Rothenberg, T. G. Masterson, Angular Distribution of 24‐MeV Neutrons Scattered by Protons, Univ. of Wisc. abstract for APS Washington meeting, April (1969).

  36. 36. S. C. Wright, D. Shawhan, L. Pondrom, S. Olsen, R. Handler, Phys. Rev. 175, 1704 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  37. 37. M. H. Mac Gregor, R. M. Wright, R. A. Arndt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1209 (1967); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    M. H. Mac Gregor, R. A. Arndt, R. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. 179, 1624 (1969).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  38. 38. J. Bystricky, J. Čech, Z. Janout, Yu. M. Kazarinov, F. Lehar, L. B. Parfenov, Phys. Lett. 28B, 572 (1969).

  39. 39. Proceedings of the 1st International Colloquium on Nucleon–Nucleon and Pion–Nucleon Interactions, Dubna, lune (1968) (in Russian).

  40. 40. S. I. Bilenkaya, G. Cozzika, F. Lehar, Z. Janout, Phase‐Shift Analysis of p‐p and n‐p Elastic Scattering at 735 MeV, CERN preprint, June 1969.

  41. 41. N. Hoshizaki, S. Otsuki, W. Watari, M. Yonezawa, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 27, 1199 (1962); https://doi.org/PTPKAV
    R. A. Bryan, C. R. Dismukes, W. Ramsay, Nucl. Phys. 45, 353 (1963).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  42. 42. R. A. Arndt, R. A. Bryan, M. H. Mac Gregor, Phys. Lett. 21, 314 (1966).https://doi.org/PHLTAM

  43. 43. S. Stone III, Univ. of Calif. at Berkeley thesis, A Eorm‐Free, Semiphenomenological, Error‐Bounded, Potential Representation of Two‐Nucleon Experiments, July 1969.

  44. 44. A. E. S. Green, M. H. Mac Gregor, R. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 495 (1967).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

More about the Authors

Malcolm H. Mac Gregor. Lawrence Radiation Laboratory at Livermore.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_12.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 12

Related content
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.
/
Article
Positron emission tomography’s ability to image the body’s biochemistry, not just its anatomy, makes it a powerful tool for detecting diseases.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.