Discover
/
Article

Neutrino physics

AUG 01, 1957
Frederick Reines
Clyde L. Cowan

The neutrino is one of nature’s strangest exhibits in the showcase of nuclear physics. Produced in the process of nuclear beta decay and very likely in the decay of certain members of the meson family, the neutrino lives on toward infinity with negligible probability of further interaction with matter, unaffected by anything except the gravitational field of the universe. It might be imagined that this peculiar behavior is sufficient for one particle, but as recent experimental developments stimulated by the theorists Lee and Yang have indicated, the neutrino may be near the heart of the parity puzzle: a given neutrino would seem to know right from left and to communicate this information via the law of conservation of angular momentum to particles with which it is associated in decay processes.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. Allen, Phys. Rev. 61, 692 (1942).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  2. 2. R. A. Alpher, J. W. Follin, Jr., and R. C.Herman, Phys. Rev. 92, 1347 (1953).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. L. W. Alvarez, UCRL‐328 (1949) (Unpublished).

  4. 4. J. H. Barrett, Phys. Rev. 79, 907 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  5. 5. H. A. Bethe and R. Peierls, Nature 133, 532 (1934).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  6. 6. H. A. Bethe, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 108 (1935).https://doi.org/PCPSA4

  7. 7. J. Chadwick, Verhandl. deut. physik. Ges. 16, 383 (1914).https://doi.org/VDPEAZ

  8. 8. J. Chadwick, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 136, 692 (1932).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  9. 9. C. L. Cowan, F. Reines, F. B. Harrison, H. Kruse, and A. D. McGuire, Science 124, 103 (1956).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  10. 10. C. L. Cowan and F. Reines, Phys. Rev., describing the second Savannah River Experiment (to be published).

  11. 11. R. Davis, Jr., Contributed paper, Am. Phys. Soc. meeting, Washington, D.C. (1956).

  12. 12. C. D., Ellis and W. A., Wooster, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A117, 109 (1927).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  13. 13. E. Fermi, Z. Physik 88, 161 (1934).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  14. 14. E. L. Fireman, Phys. Rev. 74, 1238 (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  15. 15. P. H. Fowler, P. S. Freier, C. M. G. Lattes, E. P. Ney, S. J. St. Lorant, Amer. Phys. Soc. meeting, paper M‐10, Washington, D.C. (1957).

  16. 16. G. Gamow and M. Schoenberg, Phys. Rev. 58, 1117 (1940).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  17. 17. G.Gamow, Phys. Today 1, No. 3, 4 (July 1948).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  18. 18. R. L. Garwin, L. M. Lederman, and M. Weinrich, Phys. Rev. 105, 1415 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  19. 19. L. Landau, Nuclear Phys. 3, 127 (1957).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  20. 20. L. M. Langer and R. J. D. Moffat, Phys. Rev. 88, 689 (1952).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  21. 21. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  22. 22. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 105, 1671 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  23. 23. M. E. Nahmias, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 99 (1935).https://doi.org/PCPSA4

  24. 24. W. Pauli, Jr., Address to Group on Radioactivity of Tübingen, December 4, 1930;
    Rapports du Septiems Conseil de Physique Solvay, Brussels, 1933;
    (Gautier‐Villars, Paris, 1934).

  25. 25. W. Pauli, Handbuch der Physik (Published by Julius Springer, Berlin, 1933), Vol. 24, p. 83.

  26. 26. B. Pontecorvo, National Research Council of Canada, P. D.‐205 (November 20, 1946) (Unpublished).

  27. 27. M. H. L. Pryce, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A165, 247 (1938).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  28. 28. F. Reines and C. L. Cowan, Phys. Rev. 92, 830 (1953).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  29. 29. J. M. Robson, Phys. Rev. 78, 311 (1950); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. M. Robson, Phys. Rev. 83, 349 (1951).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  30. 30. A. Salam, Nuovo cimento 5, 299 (1957).https://doi.org/NUCIAD

  31. 31. A. H. Snell and L. C. Miller, Phys. Rev. 74, 1714A (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  32. 32. K. C. Wang, Phys. Rev. 61, 97 (1942).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  33. 33. H. Weyl, Z. Physik 56, 330 (1929).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  34. 34. J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 97, 511 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  35. 35. A. Wightman. Princeton University Notes (1951) (Unpublished).

  36. 36. E. Wiener. Metallurgical Project Report CP‐720, June 2, 1943 (Unpublished).

  37. 37. C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson, Phys. Rev. 105, 1413 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

More about the Authors

Frederick Reines. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory.

Clyde L. Cowan. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1957_08.jpeg

Volume 10, Number 8

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.