Electronic Pairing in Exotic Superconductors

FEB 01, 1995

Superconductivity in heavy‐fermion materials and high‐T_c cuprates may involve electron pairing with unconventional symmetries and mechanisms.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881443

Daniel L. Cox

M. Brian Maple

Investigations of rare earth, Aactinide, organic and oxide compounds have yielded several new classes of exotic superconductors. These include magnetically ordered superconductors, A15 superconductors, buckyball superconductors, heavy‐electron superconductors, organic superconductors and high‐ $T_{c}$ oxide superconductors. These materials have properties significantly different from those of conventional superconductors such as Al and Zn, which are described well by the Bardeen‐Cooper‐Schrieffer model of superconductivity. We carefully distinguish between the BCS model and the more general BCS theory. In the BCS theory superconductivity arises, loosely speaking, from electron pairs that behave essentially as bosons and undergo macroscopic condensation to the lowest energy state at the critical temperature $T_{c}$ The BCS model, presented in 1957, further specifies that the pairing is mediated by exchange of quantized lattice vibrations (phonons) between the electrons, yielding pairs with zero spin S (spin singlet) and zero angular momentum L (s wave). This model is but one example of the BCS pairing theory; another describes the superfluid state of ³ $He,$ where the fermionic ³ $He$ atoms form p‐wave $(L = 1)$ spin‐triplet $(S = 1)$ pairs held together by the exchange of magnetic excitations of the surrounding atomic sea.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. Reviews of heavy‐fermion materials include P. A. Lee, T. M. Rice, L. J. Sham, J. Serene, J. W. Wilkins, Commun. Cond. Matt. Phys. 12, 99 (1985);
L. Gorkov, Sov. Sci. Rev. 9A, 1 (1987); https://doi.org/SSRWAZ
N. Grewe, F. Steglich, in Handbook of the Physics and Chemistry of the Rare Earths, vol. 14, K. A. Gschneidner Jr., L. L. Eyring, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam (1991), p. 343.
2. For a review see various articles in D. M. Ginsberg, ed., Physical Properties of High Temperature Superconductors, vols. I–III, World Scientific, Singapore (1989–92).
3. F.‐C. Zhang, T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
4. C. L. Seaman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2882 (1991). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
H. Amitsuka et al., Physica B 186‐188, 337 (1993).
5. W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, D. C. Morgan, R. Liang, K. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3999 (1993).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
6. R. Heffner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2816 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
7. S. E. Lambert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1619 (1986).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
8. J. Sauls reviews the understanding of UPt3 in terms of twocomponent pair wavefunctions in Adv. Phys. 43, 113 (1994).
9. A. G. Sun, L. M. Paulius, D. A. Gajewski, M. B. Maple, R. C. Dynes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2267 (1994).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
10. P. Monthoux, D. Pines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 961 (1992).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
11. C. H. Pao, N. E. Bickers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1870 (1994). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
P. Monthoux, D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1874 (1994).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
12. J. Hirsch, Physica B 199–200, 366 (1994).
13. M. R. Norman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2077 (1994).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
14. R. Laughlin, Science 242, 525 (1988). https://doi.org/SCIEAS
G. Canright, S. M. Girvin, Science 247, 1197 (1990).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
15. D. S. Rokhsar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 961 (1993).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. V. L. Berezinskii, JETP Lett. 20, 287 (1974). https://doi.org/JTPLA2
A. V. Balatsky, E. Abrahams, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13125 (1992). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
A. V. Balatsky’, E. Abrahams, J. R. Schrieffer, D. J. Scalapino, to be published in Physica B.
17. V. J. Emery, S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10812 (1992); https://doi.org/PRBMDO
V. J. Emery, S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1918 (1994).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
18. P. Coleman, E. Miranda, A. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2960 (1993). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
R. Heid, “On the Thermodynamic Stability of Odd‐in‐Frequency Superconductivity,” preprint, Ohio State U., 1994.
19. P. Noziéres, A. Blandin, J. Phys. (Paris) 41, 193 (1980). https://doi.org/JOPQAG
A. W. W. Ludwig, I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3160 (1991).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
20. D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1240 (1987); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
D. L. Cox, Physica B 186–188, 312 (1993).

More about the authors

Daniel L. Cox, Ohio State University, Columbus.

M. Brian Maple, University of California, San Diego.