A physicist at the gym
FEB 25, 2011
When I go to my gym, I sometimes see people lifting weights in physically inappropriate ways.
DOI: 10.1063/PT.5.010089
When I go to my gym, I sometimes see people lifting weights in physically inappropriate ways. By “physically inappropriate” I don’t mean that they exhibit poor, injury-inducing form or that they use weights that are dangerously heavy or ineffectually light. I mean that they don’t, to use the language of physics, do much work. First defined in the 1830s by Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis, work entails moving a force’s point of application. If you’re handling a barbell, dumbbells, or other free weights, doing work means raising the weight’s center of mass against the pull of Earth’s gravitational field. But if you don’t raise the weight, if you move it about in a horizontal plane, your workout will be workless and quite possibly worthless. One near-workless routine I’ve witnessed involves hoisting a weight above your head while simultaneously bending at the knees, thereby ensuring that weight remains at the same height. There’s no doubt that the woman in this video is doing work as she raises her own center of mass and those of two 45-pound plates and a 45-pound bar.
Although knowing the concept of work is helpful in the gym, calculating how much work you do when you lift weights can be disheartening. The work required to lift 135 pounds five times through a distance of 1 meter is 3 kJ or just 0.7 nutritional calories. Charles Day
© 2011. American Institute of Physics