National Geographic: A study in Nature that presents the most complete reconstruction so far of 2 million years of global sea-surface temperatures has been both praised and panned by scientists not involved in the work. The scientists say the reconstructed data will play an important role in establishing a clear understanding of Earth’s climate history. But it’s the conclusion that the paper’s author draws—that even if all further greenhouse gas emissions were capped, global temperatures could still rise by up to 7 °C—that has received harsh criticism. The author, Carolyn Snyder, who is now at the US Environmental Protection Agency, says that the prediction was not the primary goal of the work; she was just examining what the relationship between sea-surface temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels might mean in the future. But other scientists argue that she has incorrectly extrapolated the future relationship by basing it on past climate changes that were caused by factors other than greenhouse gases.
The finding that the Saturnian moon may host layers of icy slush instead of a global ocean could change how planetary scientists think about other icy moons as well.
Modeling the shapes of tree branches, neurons, and blood vessels is a thorny problem, but researchers have just discovered that much of the math has already been done.
January 29, 2026 12:52 PM
Get PT in your inbox
PT The Week in Physics
A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.
One email per week
PT New Issue Alert
Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.
One email per month
PT Webinars & White Papers
The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.