Early start for experiments at Homestake underground lab
DOI: 10.1063/1.2835149
Four months after choosing the disused Homestake gold mine in South Dakota as the site for the proposed Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (see Physics Today, August 2007, page 34
Led by Kevin Lesko (University of California, Berkeley), the team that championed the Homestake proposal has now been funded for the next three years to prepare a detailed engineering design for DUSEL. That effort must, of course, take account of the first group of major experiments that will be chosen from among competing proposals during the design phase. But the start of full-scale construction of the $500 million DUSEL facility has to await approval from the funding agencies and ultimately from Congress. That’s unlikely to happen before 2011.
Starting with SUSEL
But the state of South Dakota, which has a considerable stake in the enterprise, is not sitting idly by, waiting for Washington to decide. Funded by a $70 million gift from South Dakota banker and philanthropist T. Denny Sanford and by appropriations of some $45 million from its legislature plus a modest congressional earmark, the state hopes to jump-start DUSEL with its own Sanford Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory. Part of the impetus for SUSEL is the specter of inexorably rising ground water in the 8000-foot (2400 m) mine—the deepest in North America—since the pumps were shut off when the 126-year-old mine ceased operation in 2003. If nothing is done, by the end of February the water will reach the cavern at the 4850-foot (1480 m) level that for 37 years hosted the detector with which Raymond Davis discovered the shortfall of neutrinos from the Sun and won a Nobel Prize (see Physics Today, December 2002, page 16
“We expect pumping to recommence in January,” says newly appointed SUSEL director Jose Alonso, “and we hope to begin preparing the 4850-foot level for reoccupation by April.” SUSEL has initiated an Early Implementation Program (EIP) under which moderate-scale experiments in a variety of fields will be invited to get started in suitably refurbished parts of the mine as early as this year. The EIP foresees the possibility of significant scientific and engineering results by 2009. “That certainly couldn’t hurt DUSEL’s prospects,” says Lesko.
In November 2005, almost two years before NSF chose Homestake from among competing sites, the South Dakota Science and Technology Authority invited letters of interest from prospective Homestake experimenters. It then put together a program advisory committee, chaired by physicist Frank Sciulli (Columbia University) and geologist Derek Elsworth (Pennsylvania State University) to vet some 85 letters. From among the proposals it deemed good candidates or the Homestake facility, the committee in its May 2006 report took special note of those that seemed suitable for the EIP.
Now that Homestake has won the site competition, Alonso and his SUSEL colleagues have been in conversation with those EIP candidates. Some have, in the meantime, opted to accept invitations from existing underground labs like the 6800-foot-deep Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Ontario. But from those conversations have emerged a number of prospective EIP projects that already have funding and could move expeditiously into the 4850-foot cavern and shallower levels at Homestake.
EIP candidates
A list of nine such proposals was presented at the November town meeting. Four were particle-physics experiments. Among them is LUX, a collaboration led by Rick Gaitskell (Brown University) and Tom Shutt (Case Western Reserve University) that has already begun building a large liquid-xenon dark-matter detector to follow up on the pioneering XENON10 experiment carried out at the Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy (see Physics Today, August 2007, page 16
Also on the EIP list is a proposal by a seismological collaboration headed by Steven Glaser (UC Berkeley) and Bill Roggenthen (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology) to create a unique large-volume seismic observatory that extends throughout the mine from instruments at the surface all the way down to probes at 8000 feet.
Then there is a planned undertaking, led by Sookie Bang (SDSM&T) and Mark Conrad (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), to extensively sample material during early excavation for the purpose of establishing baselines for future experiments in geology, biology, chemistry, and hydrology. And two projects on the EIP list are regarded as essential precursors for future large-scale experiments at DUSEL: A collaboration headed by Milind Diwan (Brookhaven National Laboratory) and Kenneth Lande (University of Pennsylvania) seeks to characterize the rock structure at the 4850-foot level in preparation for excavating an enormous new cavern that would house a megaton water-Cherenkov detector for long-baseline neutrino experiments and a search for proton decay. Also at the 4850-foot level, William Roggenthen (SDSM&T), Dongming Mei (University of South Dakota), and collaborators propose to build a low-background counting facility that would be used to measure residual radioactivity in ultrapure materials intended for incorporation into sensitive experiments.
Addressing the town meeting, South Dakota Governor Mike Rounds admitted that, for a state whose population barely exceeds 700 000, the allocation of so much money before DUSEL is approved is “a calculated risk.” But he spoke passionately of the educational and intellectual benefits such a world-class facility would bring to his state, which until now has had little to show its schoolchildren or offer its college graduates in the way of scientific research.

Lesko


Alonso
SUSEL
