What is ‘real’: A brief comparison
DOI: 10.1063/1.2947632
Steven French’s review of Bernard d’Espagnat’s 500-page tome On Physics and Philosophy (Physics Today, June 2007, page 66
French states that the Real “nevertheless exerts an influence on the phenomena.”
Aquinas wrote, “As there can be nothing which is not created by God, so there can be nothing which is not subject to His government” (part 1, question 103, article 5).
French writes, “The grand laws of physics are ‘highly distorted reflections … of the great structures of “the Real”’ (page 455)…. The Real, although impossible to conceive, is nonseparable; from it, both consciousness and empirical reality ‘co-emerge.’”
Aquinas wrote, “From the knowledge of sensible things the whole power of God cannot be known; nor therefore can His essence be seen. But because they are His effects and depend on their cause, we can be led from them so far as to know of God whether He exists, and to know of Him what must necessarily belong to Him, as the first cause of all things, exceeding all things caused by Him” (part 1, question 12, article 12).
Aquinas maintained that there cannot ultimately be any disagreement between faith and reason because both come from an infinitely faithful and infinitely reasonable God. It is amusing that an apparently secular philosopher such as d’Espagnat, writing for a modern audience of physicists and philosophers and basing his thought on the latest results of quantum mechanics, has nevertheless arrived at conclusions in harmony with the greatest philosopher of the Middle Ages.
More about the Authors
Karl D. Stephan. (kdstephan@txstate.edu) Texas State University–San, Marcos, US .