Discover
/
Article

Simple, low-tech option for carbon sequestration

JAN 01, 2013
Philip Ugorowski

The August 2012 issue of Physics Today (page 22 ) contains an item by David Kramer that discusses problems associated with present carbon capture and storage technologies that use geologic sequestration. Several high-tech methods for carbon sequestration are being developed, but one low-tech method is as simple as disposing of discarded wood by burying it rather than burning it. Wood is approximately 50% carbon, and when it decomposes or burns, the temporarily sequestered carbon is returned to the atmosphere. Planting trees can help, but new forests act as carbon sinks only until the rate of decay of the wood catches up to the rate of growth. As a complement to the present scientific and engineering efforts, encouraging communities to “bury, don’t burn” discarded wood could be a relatively cheap and easy way to sequester carbon.

Nothing is more low tech than digging a hole, and in landfills that are simply covered with soil, 0–3% of the carbon from wood is released as carbon dioxide and methane after several decades, with the remaining carbon mostly stored as a long-term nonreactive solid mass. In landfills designed to remain dry, methane release is negligible, and the wood doesn’t decompose. 1 , 2 Globally, the emission rate from fossil-fuel consumption is about 8 gigatons of carbon per year (GtC/yr), with an accumulated load of about 165 GtC in the atmosphere. An uptake of 60 GtC/yr, including an estimated 10 GtC/yr from large pieces of dead wood, is temporarily sequestered by land vegetation. Municipally collected waste (old furniture, construction waste, cleared brush, and so forth) is estimated at 1 GtC/yr, although the percentage presently burned is unknown. 3

References

  1. 1. J. A. Micales, K. E. Skog, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr 39, 145 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(97)83389-6

  2. 2. J. Bogner, K. Spokas, in Soils and Global Change, R. Lal et al., eds., Lewis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1995), p. 67.

  3. 3. N. Zeng, Carbon Balance Manage 3, 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-1

More about the authors

Philip Ugorowski, (pugo@k-state.edu) Kansas State University, Manhattan.

Related content
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_2013_01.jpeg

Volume 66, Number 1

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.