Vavagiakis, Bachlechner, and Kleban reply:Fritz Bopp correctly points out that creating a potential difference necessitates a nonzero electric field. He goes on to assert that the field must cross the particles’ paths, differentially accelerating them. If that were the case, the difference in phase could indeed be explained by the interaction of the particles with the electric field. As we describe in our Quick Study, however, the field could be switched on for a while and then off again while the particles are deep inside two long, tubular Faraday cages. Those cages shield the particles from contact with the nonzero field, yet while the field is on, there is a potential difference between the interiors of the two cages. That potential difference is therefore responsible for the difference in phase.
More about the authors
Eve Vavagiakis,
(ev66@cornell.edu) Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Thomas Bachlechner,
(thomas@meetelise.com) MeetElise, New York City.
Matthew Kleban,
(kleban@nyu.edu) New York University, New York City.
Research that combines fluid dynamics and climate science is uncovering the inner workings of the North Atlantic’s overturning circulation. Future changes to that circulation system could trigger major disruptions to global weather patterns.
June 01, 2024 12:00 AM
This Content Appeared In
Volume 75, Number 8
Get PT newsletters in your inbox
PT The Week in Physics
A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.
One email per week
PT New Issue Alert
Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.
One email per month
PT Webinars & White Papers
The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.