Discover
/
Article

On the stature of Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin

NOV 01, 2020

DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.4605

David Weintraub

Weintraub replies to Calvin: The Forrest Gump metaphor was admittedly imperfect, as Scott Calvin suggests . But I disagree with Calvin’s other criticisms. Whether Henry Norris Russell forced her or Cecilia Payne merely chose to modify her dissertation conclusions after Russell advised her to do so, her decision to capitulate is the nearly universal response to force majeure. When the most prominent scientist in one’s profession dismisses the work of a graduate student as wrong, the student ignores that criticism at great peril to their career. This is true now and was certainly true a century ago.

Payne did what she had to do to secure a necessary signature and her doctoral degree and to transition into the next phase of her career. Any other decision would have been professional suicide. To imply that Russell made a suggestion Payne could ignore is to misrepresent the power dynamics of the situation, one in which Russell was extremely powerful and Payne was powerless.

More about the Authors

David Weintraub. (david.a.weintraub@vanderbilt.edu) Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

This Content Appeared In
pt_cover1120_no_label.jpg

Volume 73, Number 11

Related content
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.