Discover
/
Article

Counterterrorism Priorities and Policy

SEP 01, 2003

DOI: 10.1063/1.4797149

Henry E. Heatherly

In their article, Jay Davis and Don Prosnitz use the now common phrase “weapons of mass destruction” (WMDs). I have yet to see a working, decisive definition of the term.

According to some sources, a Scud missile with a conventional high-explosive warhead is a WMD, but a flight of B-52 bombers carrying tons of high explosives apparently is not. What about a bunker-buster bomb, or an artillery shell with a mustard-gas warhead? In public policy debates, especially those regarding warfare, clear definitions of the key words or phrases would be helpful. What is a WMD? What do the experts mean when they use this term?

More about the Authors

Henry E. Heatherly. Lafayette, Louisiana, US .

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_2003_09.jpeg

Volume 56, Number 9

Related content
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.