Coherence and precision in classical systems
DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.1584
The Quick Study “Collaboration and precision in quantum measurement” (PHYSICS TODAY, December 2011, page 72
However, coherence is not merely a quantum mechanical effect; many classical systems exhibit similar behavior. For example, one can search for ultrahigh-energy neutrino interactions in Antarctic ice by observing the coherent radio pulses emitted by the resulting particle showers. The observed electric field strength of the pulse scales as the square of the number of particles in the shower (reference ; see also the article I wrote with Francis Halzen, PHYSICS TODAY, May 2008, page 29
There are also examples of 1/N scaling without coherence. Consider a system consisting of a noninteracting gas in a reservoir at pressure P, and a small valve that controls access to a gas sensor. The best measurement of the valve’s opening time comes from the first gas molecule observed by the sensor. As one increases the pressure (number of probe molecules N), the time delay between the gate opening and the sensor decreases in a 1/N fashion. For large N, that is more accurate than finding the mean arrival time of the molecules, with an accuracy of 1/√N, and trying to correct for the average delay time.
These comments are not to take anything away from the nice study by Sewell and Mitchell. However, measurements that exhibit 1/N scaling are not limited to quantum systems, and are more common than one might imagine.
References
1. P. W. Gorham et al., Phys. Rev. D 72, 023002 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.023002
More about the Authors
Spencer Klein. (srklein@lbl.gov) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.