Discover
/
Article

Why the sky is dark at night

FEB 01, 1974
In a universe uniformly filled with stars we would expect the sky to be ablaze with light from all directions, according to a 250‐year‐old paradox we are just beginning to understand.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3128443

Edward R. Harrison

Let us imagine that stars similar to the Sun are uniformly distributed in an infinite and static universe. Edmund Halley in 1720, J. P. Loys de Chéseaux in 1744, and H. Wilhelm M. Olbers in 1823 showed this seemingly reasonable 16th and 17th century model of the universe leads to a remarkable paradox. For whatever direction we look in the sky our line of sight eventually intercepts a star, and the whole sky should therefore be ablaze with light as bright as the Sun. This startling disagreement between theory and observation is nowadays referred to as “Olbers’s paradox.”

References

  1. 1. E. Halley, Phil. Trans. 31, 22 (1720, https://doi.org/PTRSAV
    and E. Halley, 31, 24 (1720).https://doi.org/PTRSAV , Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London

  2. 2. J. P. L. de Chéseaux, Traité de la Cométe, Bousquet, Lausanne (1744); appendix II, page 223.

  3. 3. H. W. M. Olbers, “Ueber die Durchsichtigkeit des Weltraums,” in Astronomisches Jahrbuch für das Jahr 1826, (J. E. Bode, ed.) Späthen, Berlin (1823); page 110.

  4. 4. O. Struve, Sky and Telescope 25, 140 (1963).https://doi.org/SKTEA3

  5. 5. J. D. North, Measure of the Universe, Clarenden, Oxford (1965).

  6. 6. S. L. Jaki, The Paradox of Olbers’ Paradox, Herder, New York (1969)
    and Am. J. Phys. 35, 200 (1967).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  7. 7. H. Bondi, Advancement of Science 12, 33 (1955).https://doi.org/ADSCAH

  8. 8. H. Bondi, Cosmology, Cambridge U.P. (1960).

  9. 9. G. C. McVittie, Fact and Theory in Cosmology, Eyre & Spottiswoode, London (1961).

  10. 10. G. J. Whitrow, B. D. Yallop, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 127, 301 (1964) https://doi.org/MNRAA4
    and G. J. Whitrow, B. D. Yallop, 130, 31 (1965).https://doi.org/MNRAA4 , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

  11. 11. G. C. McVittie, General Relativity and Cosmology, 2nd ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1965).

  12. 12. D. W. Sciama, Modern Cosmology, Cambridge U.P. (1971).

  13. 13. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, Wiley, New York (1972).

  14. 14. See also popular texts: G. Gamow, Sci. Am., March 1954, page 54;
    F. Hoyle, Frontiers of Astronomy, Harper, New York (1955);
    D. W. Sciama, Unity of the Universe, Faber, London (1959);
    R. A. Lyttleton, The Modern Universe, Hodder & Stoughton, London (1956);
    G. J. Whitrow, Structure and Evolution of the Universe, Hutchinson, London (1959);
    J. Singh, Great Ideas and Theories of Modern Cosmology, Constable, London (1961);
    C. A. Rowan, Changing Views of the Universe, Macmillan, New York (1961);
    W. Bonnor, Mystery of the Expanding Universe, Macmillan, New York (1964);
    I. Asimov, The Universe, Avon, New York (1966);
    P. W. Hodge, Galaxies and Cosmology, McGraw‐Hill, New York (1966);
    E. Schatzman, Origin and Evolution of the Universe, Hutchinson, London (1966);
    D. H. Menzel, F. L. Whipple, G. de Vaucouleurs, Survey of the Universe, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1970).

  15. 15. M. Scharzschild, Structure and Evolution of the Stars, Princeton U.P. (1958).

  16. 16. G. F. R. Ellis, E. R. Harrison, Comm. Astrophys. Space Phys. (in press).

  17. 17. E. R. Harrison, Nature 204, 271 (1964); https://doi.org/NATUAS
    E. R. Harrison, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 131, 1 (1965).https://doi.org/MNRAA4

  18. 18. R. Weymann, Astrophys. J. 145, 560 (1966).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  19. 19. A. Sandage, PHYSICS TODAY, February 1970, page 34.

  20. 20. W. Rindler, PHYSICS TODAY, November 1967, page 23.

  21. 21. W. B. Bonnor, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 128, 33 (1964).https://doi.org/MNRAA4

  22. 22. Discussed by R. Schlegel, Am. J. Phys. 26, 601 (1958).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  23. 23. H. Bondi, T. Gold, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 108, 252 (1948).https://doi.org/MNRAA4

  24. 24. F. Hoyle, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 108, 372 (1948) https://doi.org/MNRAA4
    and F. Hoyle, 109, 365 (1949).https://doi.org/MNRAA4 , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

More about the Authors

Edward R. Harrison. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1974_02.jpeg

Volume 27, Number 2

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.