Discover
/
Article

What is the point of so‐called “axiomatic field theory”?

SEP 01, 1969
This method is incapable at present of calculating cross sections and is often thought to be obsessively mathematical. Neverthless it offers a conceptual clarity indispensible for understanding the quantum mechanics of systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom.
Arthur S. Wightman

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY is well described by an adjective that Robert Oppenheimer once applied to the Fermi theory of beta decay; it is robust. It has had its ups and downs, but it somehow seems to survive all vicissitudes and continues to provide the best available language for the description of elementary‐particle phenomena. Here I shall try to describe the origins and some of the achievements and objectives of the particular brand of field theory customarily referred to as “axiomatic.” I will thereby try to answer the question posed by the title.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. N. Kemmer, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 34, 354 (1938).https://doi.org/PCPSA4

  2. 2. W. Pauli, Meson Theory of Nuclear Forces, Interscience, New York (2nd edition 1948).

  3. 3. L. Van Hove, Phys. Rev. 75, 1519 (1949).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. M. Levy, Phys. Rev. 88, 72 and (1952).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  5. 5. M. L. Goldberger, in proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Theoretical Physics, Purdue University, April 1960.
    Quoted in Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 11, 95 (1961).https://doi.org/ARNUA8

  6. 6. A. M. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. 158, 1454 (1967).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  7. 7. R. F. Streater, A. S. Wightman, PCT, Spin and Statistics and All That, W. A. Benjamin, New York (1964).

  8. 8. R. Jost, The General Theory of Quantized Fields, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R. I. (1965).

  9. 9. J. von Neumann, Math. Ann. 104, 570 (1931).https://doi.org/MAANA3

  10. 10. Bibliography of reference 8.

  11. 11. H. J. Borchers, Nuovo Cimento 15, 184 (1960).https://doi.org/NUCIAD

  12. 12. Proceedings of the 45th Varenna course, 12–24 August 1968, Academic Press, New York.

  13. 13. K. Symanzik, “Many‐particle Structure of Green’s Functions” in Symposium on Theoretical Physics, vol. 3, p. 121, Plenum Press, New York (1967).

  14. 14. R. Kadison, “Operator Algebras” in Cargèse Lectures in Theoretical Physics 1965 (F. Lurcat, ed.) Gordon and Breach, New York (1967).

  15. 15. S. Doplicher, D. Kastler, Comments in Math Phys. 7, 1 (1968) and references cited therein.

More about the Authors

Arthur S. Wightman. Princeton University.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_09.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 9

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.