Discover
/
Article

What Future Will We Choose for Physics?

DEC 01, 1995
US physics faculties are aging rapidly and responding far too slowly to new opportunities across the sciences. We must reverse the trends if we are to preserve the historic vitality of the profession.
Sol M. Gruner
James S. Langer
Phil Nelson
Viola Vogel

Science in the United States is in a time of pain and uncertainty. The pain is felt most acutely by young scientists, who are having great difficulty establishing their careers. The uncertainty about the duration and outcome of the current situation stems from its roots in ponderous events of recent history—the end of the cold war, industrial downsizing, government deficits and demographic trends. Although budget difficulties and lack of jobs plague most of the sciences, the atmosphere of uncertainty about the future is palpably different from one profession to the next. Our concern here is with the profession of physics.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. L. Grodzins, The Transition in Physics Doctoral Employment, 1960–1990, American Physical Society, New York (1979).

  2. 2. M. D. Fiske, executive summary in L. Grodzins, The Transition in Physics Doctoral Employment, 1960–1990, American Physical Society, New York (1979).

  3. 3. Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, Merriam‐Webster, Springfield, Mass. (1860).

  4. 4. Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, Merriam‐Webster, Springfield, Mass. (1934).

  5. 5. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Merriam‐Webster, Springfield, Mass. (1985).

  6. 6. M. H. Shamos, ed., Great Experiments in Physics, Holt, New York (1959);
    reprinted by Dover, New York (1987).

  7. 7. M. D. Fiske, executive summary in L. Grodzins, The Transition in Physics Doctoral Employment, 1960–1990, American Physical Society, New York (1979).

  8. 8. National Academy of Sciences Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, Reshaping the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers, National Academy Press Washington, DC (1995).

  9. 9. S. R. Weart, in The Sciences in the American Context: New Perspectives, N. Reingold, ed., Smithsonian Inst. P. Washington, DC (1979), p. 295.

  10. 10. B. Schwartz, ed., Graduate Student Packet, American Physical Society, College Park, Md. (1994).

More about the authors

Sol M. Gruner, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.

James S. Langer, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Phil Nelson, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Viola Vogel, University of Washington, Seattle.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1995_12.jpeg

Volume 48, Number 12

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.