Discover
/
Article

Ultrahigh vacuum: A survey

AUG 01, 1963
This summary of the recent history of ultrahigh‐vacuum technology is based on an invited paper presented on January 25 at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society in New York City. Professor Alpert is a member of the Coordinated Science Laboratory at the University of Illinois in Urbana.
Daniel Alpert

Somewhat over a decade ago, certain problems in the physics laboratory led to a major step forward in vacuum technology. These problems were in the fields of atomic collision processes and surface physics, in which it was impossible to obtain either high gas purity or atomically clean surfaces with the experimental techniques available. For example, at a pressure of 10−7Torr (1 Torr is approximately = 1 mmHg) of molecular gas, a surface which had been previously cleaned would adsorb a complete monolayer of gas in a matter of seconds. The combined efforts of a number of physicists resulted in a new set of tools which made it possible to achieve and measure pressure two or three orders of magnitude lower than was previously possible: that is, pressures down to 10−10 or somewhat lower. Among them were Nottingham of MIT and groups at three major laboratories: Apker at General Electric, Lander and Becker at Bell Telephone Laboratories, and several of us at Westinghouse Research Laboratories.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. For a review of early contributions see D. Alpert, Handbuch der Physik 12, 39 (1958).

  2. 2. a. J. T. Mark and W. G. Henderson, 1961 Vacuum Symposium Transactions 1 (Pergamon Press, 1962), 31.
    b. J. T. Mark and K. Dreyer, 1959 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (Pergamon Press, 1960), 176.

  3. 3. W. J. Lange and D. Alpert, Rev. Sci. Instr. 28, 726 (1957).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  4. 4. D. G. Bills and F. G. Allen, Rev. Sci. Instr. 26, 654 (1955).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  5. 5. a. R. Zaphiropoulos, 1959 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (Pergamon Press, 1960), 307.
    b. W. R. Wheeler and M. Carlson, 1961 Vacuum Symposium Transactions 2 (Pergamon Press, 1962), 1309.

  6. 6. M. A. Biondi, 1960 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (Pergamon Press, 1961), 28.

  7. 7. R. L. Hall, 1958 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (Pergamon Press, 1959), 41.

  8. 8. R. Jepsen, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 2519 (1961).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  9. 9. W. C. Schuemann, 1962 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (The Macmillan Company, 1963), 428.

  10. 10. A. Klopfer and W. Schmidt, Vacuum 10, 363 (1960); https://doi.org/VACUAV
    also private communication.

  11. 11. a. W. D. Davis, 1962 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (The Macmillan Company, 1963), 363.
    b. W. Davis and T. Vanderslice, 1960 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (Pergamon Press, 1961), 417.

  12. 12. J. Lafferty, 1962 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (The Macmillan Company, 1963), 438.

  13. 13. R. Gomer, Adv. in Catalysis 7, 93 (1955).

  14. 14. J. P. Hobson, 1961 Vacuum Symposium Transactions 1 (Pergamon Press, 1962), 146.

  15. 15. J. M. Houston, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 2, 301 (1956).https://doi.org/BAPSA6

  16. 16. P. A. Redhead, Rev. Sci. Instr. 31, 343 (1960).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  17. 17. D. Lee, Rev. Sci. Instr. (in press).

  18. 18. G. H. Metson, Br. J. Appl. Phys. 2, 46 (1951).https://doi.org/BJAPAJ

  19. 19. P. A. Redhead, Vacuum 12, 267 (1962).https://doi.org/VACUAV

  20. 20. J. W. Ackley, C. F. Lothrup and W. R. Wheeler, 1962 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (The Macmillan Company, 1963), 452.

  21. 21. D. A. Degras, L. A. Petermann and A. Schram, 1962 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (The Macmillan Company, 1963), 497.

  22. 22. G. Moore, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1241 (1961).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  23. 23. H. Riemersma, R. E. Fox and W. J. Lange, 1960 Vacuum Symposium Transactions (Pergamon Press, 1961), 92.

More about the Authors

Daniel Alpert. University of Illinois, Urbana.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1963_08.jpeg

Volume 16, Number 8

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.