Discover
/
Article

Ultraheavy cosmic rays

MAY 01, 1975
The distribution of the high‐Z nuclei, the youngest elements in the Galaxy, can help us understand the synthesis of matter in exploding stars and its interactions en route to Earth.
Martin H. Israel
P. Buford Price
C. Jake Waddington

Ultraheavy cosmic‐ray nuclei, those with atomic number over thirty, constitute less than about one in 107 of the relativistic particles that stream through our solar system, yet they promise to lead to a major contribution in our understanding of the complex phenomena of the cosmic‐ray gas that pervades interstellar space. The study of these nuclei should advance our understanding of the sources of cosmic rays as well as of the nature of the physical processes that influence the particles after their acceleration. This work is greatly accelerating with the advent of satellite experiments, such as the Skylab mission pictured in figure 1.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. R. M. Walker, R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, post‐deadline talk presented at the Ninth International Cosmic Ray Conference (London, 1965);
    R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, R. M. Walker, M. Maurette, G. Morgan, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 355 (1967).https://doi.org/JGREA2

  2. 2. P. H. Fowler, R. A. Adams, V. G. Cowen, J. M. Kidd, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 301, 39 (1967); https://doi.org/PRLAAZ
    P. H. Fowler, V. M. Clapham, V. G. Cowen, J. M. Kidd, R. T. Moses, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 318, 1 (1970).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  3. 3. P. B. Price, R. L. Fleischer, D. D. Peterson, C. O’Ceallaigh, D. O’Sullivan, A. Thompson, Phys. Rev. 164, 1618 (1967); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    P. B. Price, R. L. Fleischer, D. D. Peterson, C. O’Ceallaigh, D. O’Sullivan, A. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 630 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  4. 4. P. Meyer, R. Ramaty, W. R. Webber, PHYSICS TODAY, October 1974, page 23.

  5. 5. A. G. W. Cameron, Space Science Reviews 15, 121 (1973).https://doi.org/SPSRA4

  6. 6. D. D. Clayton, Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, McGraw‐Hill (1968), chapter 7.

  7. 7. W. D. Arnett, D. N. Schramm, Astrophys. J. Lett. 184, L47 (1973).https://doi.org/AJLEAU

  8. 8. J. B. Blake, D. N. Schramm, Astrophysics and Space Science 30, 275 (1974).https://doi.org/APSSBE

  9. 9. J. R. Nix, PHYSICS TODAY, April 1972, page 30.

  10. 10. R. R. Chasman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 544 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  11. 11. W. M. Howard, J. R. Nix, Nature 247, 17 (1974).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  12. 12. J. W. Epstein, J. J. Fernandez, M. H. Israel, J. Klarmann, R. A. Mewaldt, W. R. Binns, Nuclear Inst. and Meth. 95, 77 (1971).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  13. 13. G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, W. C. Wells, R. L. Fleischer, G. E. Nichols, P. B. Price, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 338 (1969); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    P. B. Price, P. H. Fowler, J. M. Kidd, E. J. Kobetich, R. L. Fleischer, G. E. Nichols, Phys. Rev. D 3, 815 (1971); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, S. S. Pomeroy, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, P. H. Fowler, J. M. Kidd, E. J. Kobetich, R. T. Moses, R. T. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1707 (1973); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1722 (1973).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  14. 14. G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, S. S. Pomeroy, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 6037 (1972).https://doi.org/JGREA2

  15. 15. D. O’Sullivan, P. B. Price, E. K. Shirk, P. H. Fowler, J. M. Kidd, E. J. Kobetich, R. Thorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 463 (1971); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    E. K. Shirk, P. B. Price, E. J. Kobetich, W. Z. Osborne, L. S. Pinsky, R. D. Eandi, R. B. Rushing, Phys. Rev. D 7, 3220 (1973); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    W. Z. Osborne, L. S. Pinsky, E. K. Shirk, P. B. Price, E. J. Kobetich, R. D. Eandi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 127 (1973); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    P. H. Fowler, R. T. Thorne, A. P. Muzumdar, C. O’Ceallaigh, D. O’Sullivan, Y. V. Rao, A. Thompson, Proceedings of the 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference (University of Denver) 5, 3239 (1973).

  16. 16. P. A. Fowler, Proceedings of the 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference 5, 3627 (1973).

  17. 17. E. K. Shirk, P. B. Price, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.

  18. 18. W. R. Binns, J. I. Fernandez, M. H. Israel, J. Klarmann, R. C. Maehl, R. A. Mewaldt, Proceedings of the 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference 1, 260 (1973).

More about the Authors

Martin H. Israel. Associate Professor of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis.

P. Buford Price. Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley.

C. Jake Waddington. Professor of Physics, University of Minnesota.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1975_05.jpeg

Volume 28, Number 5

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.