Discover
/
Article

Ultraheavy cosmic rays

MAY 01, 1975
The distribution of the high‐Z nuclei, the youngest elements in the Galaxy, can help us understand the synthesis of matter in exploding stars and its interactions en route to Earth.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3068964

Martin H. Israel
P. Buford Price
C. Jake Waddington

Ultraheavy cosmic‐ray nuclei, those with atomic number over thirty, constitute less than about one in 107 of the relativistic particles that stream through our solar system, yet they promise to lead to a major contribution in our understanding of the complex phenomena of the cosmic‐ray gas that pervades interstellar space. The study of these nuclei should advance our understanding of the sources of cosmic rays as well as of the nature of the physical processes that influence the particles after their acceleration. This work is greatly accelerating with the advent of satellite experiments, such as the Skylab mission pictured in figure 1.

References

  1. 1. R. M. Walker, R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, post‐deadline talk presented at the Ninth International Cosmic Ray Conference (London, 1965);
    R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, R. M. Walker, M. Maurette, G. Morgan, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 355 (1967).https://doi.org/JGREA2

  2. 2. P. H. Fowler, R. A. Adams, V. G. Cowen, J. M. Kidd, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 301, 39 (1967); https://doi.org/PRLAAZ
    P. H. Fowler, V. M. Clapham, V. G. Cowen, J. M. Kidd, R. T. Moses, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 318, 1 (1970).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  3. 3. P. B. Price, R. L. Fleischer, D. D. Peterson, C. O’Ceallaigh, D. O’Sullivan, A. Thompson, Phys. Rev. 164, 1618 (1967); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    P. B. Price, R. L. Fleischer, D. D. Peterson, C. O’Ceallaigh, D. O’Sullivan, A. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 630 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  4. 4. P. Meyer, R. Ramaty, W. R. Webber, PHYSICS TODAY, October 1974, page 23.

  5. 5. A. G. W. Cameron, Space Science Reviews 15, 121 (1973).https://doi.org/SPSRA4

  6. 6. D. D. Clayton, Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, McGraw‐Hill (1968), chapter 7.

  7. 7. W. D. Arnett, D. N. Schramm, Astrophys. J. Lett. 184, L47 (1973).https://doi.org/AJLEAU

  8. 8. J. B. Blake, D. N. Schramm, Astrophysics and Space Science 30, 275 (1974).https://doi.org/APSSBE

  9. 9. J. R. Nix, PHYSICS TODAY, April 1972, page 30.

  10. 10. R. R. Chasman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 544 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  11. 11. W. M. Howard, J. R. Nix, Nature 247, 17 (1974).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  12. 12. J. W. Epstein, J. J. Fernandez, M. H. Israel, J. Klarmann, R. A. Mewaldt, W. R. Binns, Nuclear Inst. and Meth. 95, 77 (1971).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  13. 13. G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, W. C. Wells, R. L. Fleischer, G. E. Nichols, P. B. Price, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 338 (1969); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    P. B. Price, P. H. Fowler, J. M. Kidd, E. J. Kobetich, R. L. Fleischer, G. E. Nichols, Phys. Rev. D 3, 815 (1971); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, S. S. Pomeroy, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, P. H. Fowler, J. M. Kidd, E. J. Kobetich, R. T. Moses, R. T. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1707 (1973); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1722 (1973).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  14. 14. G. E. Blanford, M. W. Friedlander, J. Klarmann, S. S. Pomeroy, R. M. Walker, J. P. Wefel, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 6037 (1972).https://doi.org/JGREA2

  15. 15. D. O’Sullivan, P. B. Price, E. K. Shirk, P. H. Fowler, J. M. Kidd, E. J. Kobetich, R. Thorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 463 (1971); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    E. K. Shirk, P. B. Price, E. J. Kobetich, W. Z. Osborne, L. S. Pinsky, R. D. Eandi, R. B. Rushing, Phys. Rev. D 7, 3220 (1973); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    W. Z. Osborne, L. S. Pinsky, E. K. Shirk, P. B. Price, E. J. Kobetich, R. D. Eandi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 127 (1973); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    P. H. Fowler, R. T. Thorne, A. P. Muzumdar, C. O’Ceallaigh, D. O’Sullivan, Y. V. Rao, A. Thompson, Proceedings of the 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference (University of Denver) 5, 3239 (1973).

  16. 16. P. A. Fowler, Proceedings of the 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference 5, 3627 (1973).

  17. 17. E. K. Shirk, P. B. Price, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.

  18. 18. W. R. Binns, J. I. Fernandez, M. H. Israel, J. Klarmann, R. C. Maehl, R. A. Mewaldt, Proceedings of the 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference 1, 260 (1973).

More about the Authors

Martin H. Israel. Associate Professor of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis.

P. Buford Price. Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley.

C. Jake Waddington. Professor of Physics, University of Minnesota.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1975_05.jpeg

Volume 28, Number 5

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.