Thomson's dilemma

Bernard S. Finn

doi:10.1063/1.3034483

Features

/

Article

Thomson’s dilemma

SEP 01, 1967

Unsuccessful thermodynamic treatment of heat conduction and resistance heating led William Thomson, later Lord Kelvin, to neglect these irreversible processes and still get satisfactory results for thermoelectric phenomena.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3034483

Bernard S. Finn

APPLICATION of the second law of thermodynamics in its classical form requires that the heat of each process be convertible into work; that is, each process must be reversible. Since no real system meets this criterion, analysis is then made in terms of some imaginary limiting case in which the parameters have been adjusted to make the irreversible effects negligible. It is sometimes impossible, however, to imagine a limit in which the irreversible processes can be disregarded. This problem was first faced by William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) in his thermoelectric researches. His dilemma was this: Even if he did ignore the irreversible processes, he found he could still apply the second law with what seemed to be very satisfactory results. This dilemma was sufficiently interesting to excite some of the best theoretical and experimental minds over the century that was to follow Thomson’s work.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. T. J. Seebeck, Abhand. dent. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, p. 265 (1822–23);
Ann. Physik 6, 1, 133 (1826); https://doi.org/ANPYA2
Ostwald Klassiker 70, Leipzig (1895).
2. Ibid, (Abhandhmgen) pp. 316, 353.
3. J. Cumming, Thomson’s Annals of Philosophy 6, 321 (1823).
4. A. C. Becquerel, Ann. Chim. Phys. 31, 371 (1826).https://doi.org/ACPHAA
5. J. C. A. Peltier, Ann. Chim. Phys. 56, 371 (1834); https://doi.org/ACPHAA
J. C. A. Peltier, L’Institut 2, 133, 265 (1845).
6. S. Carnot, Reflexions sur la Puissance Motrice du Feu, Paris (1824);
English translation (E. Mendoza, ed.) Dover, New York (1960).
7. J. R. Mayer, Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie 42, 233 (1842);
J. R. Mayer, Phil. Mag. 24, 371 (1862).https://doi.org/PHMAA4
8. R. Clausius, Ann. Physik 79, 368, 500 (1850); https://doi.org/ANPYA2
R. Clausius, Phil. Mag. 2, 1, 102 (1851); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
R. Clausius, Ann. Chim. Phys. 35, 482 (1852); https://doi.org/ACPHAA
Op cit ref. 6.
9. J. P. Joule, W. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Soc. 7, 127 (1855);
J. P. Joule, W. Thomson, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 144, 321 (1854);
J. P. Joule, W. Thomson, Ann. Chim. Phys. 65, 244 (1862); https://doi.org/ACPHAA
W. Thomson, Mathematical and Physical Papers I, Cambridge (1882) p. 357, 433.
10. W. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 3, 91 (1857); https://doi.org/PRSEAE
W. Thomson, Phil. Mag. 3, 529 (1852); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
Mathematical and Physical Papers I, Cambridge (1882) p. 316.
11. W. Thomson, Mathematical and Physical Papers I, Cambridge (1882), p. 319.
12. Ibid, p. 321.
13. W. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Soc. 7, 49 (1855);
W. Thomson, Phil. Mag. 8, 62 (1854); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
Op cit, ref. 11, p. 460.
14. W. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Soc. 8, 50 (1856–67);
W. Thomson, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 146, 649 (1856);
W. Thomson, Phil. Mag. 12, 393 (1856); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
W. Thomson, Ann. Chim. Phys. 54, 105 (1858); https://doi.org/ACPHAA
Mathematical and Physical Papers II, Cambridge (1884) p. 189, 396.
15. W. Thomson, Mathematical and Physical Papers II, Cambridge (1884), p. 219.
16. Op cit ref. 10.
17. W. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 3, 255, (1857); https://doi.org/PRSEAE
W. Thomson, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. 21, 123, (1857);
W. Thomson, Phil. Mag. 11, 214, 281, (1856); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
Op cit, ref. 11, p. 232, 324.
18. Op cit, ref. 11, p. 250.
19. Ibid, p. 318.
20. H. A. Lorentz, Verslagen en Mendedeelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Weltenschappen 1, 327 (1885);
H. A. Lorentz, Arch Néerl. 20, 129 (1886).
21. P. Duhem, Ann. Chim. Phys. 12, 433 (1887).https://doi.org/ACPHAA
22. L. Boltzmann, Sitzber. Wien. Math. Natur. kl. Wien. Abt. II 96, 1258 (1888).
23. P. W. Bridgman, Phys. Rev. 14, 315 (1919).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
24. M. Planck, Ann. Physik 272, 627, 936 (1889).https://doi.org/ANPYA2
25. H. Poincaré, Thermodynamique, Paris (1892), p. 356.
26. F. W. Kohlrausch, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, p. 65 (1874);
Ann. Physik 156, 601 (1875).https://doi.org/ANPYA2
27. W. Weber, Ann. Physik 156, 43 (1875).https://doi.org/ANPYA2
28. C. V. E. Riecke, Nach. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, p. 48, 137 (1898);
Ann. Physik 66, 353, 545 (1898).https://doi.org/ANPYA2
29. O. Wiedeburg, Ann. Physik 61, 705 (1897); https://doi.org/ANPYA2
O. Wiedeburg, 62, 652 (1897); https://doi.org/ANPYA2 , Ann. Phys.
O. Wiedeburg, Ann. Physik 1, 758 (1900).https://doi.org/ANPYA2
30. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
L. Onsager, 38, 2256 (1931).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.
31. J. C. M. Li, J. Chem. Phys. 29, 747 (1958).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
32. P. W. Bridgman, Phys. Rev. 58, 845 (1940); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
The Nature of Thermodynamics, Cambridge (1941) p. 136.
33. R. C. Tolman, P. C. Fine, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 51 (1948).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

More about the authors

Bernard S. Finn, Smithsonian.