Discover
/
Article

The urinary drop spectrometer

SEP 01, 1974
Information from the external urine stream permits early, painless diagnosis of obstructions with an optical instrument developed by an interdisciplinary group.
Gerald Aiello
Pierre Lafrance
Rogers C. Ritter
James S. Trefil

A new diagnostic instrument that can potentially affect the lives of hundreds of thousands of people has resulted from a collaboration among physicians, physicists, engineers and mathematicians. This article is the case history of the interdisciplinary study which culminated in the development of the urinary drop spectrometer, a painless instrument, now in clinical use, for the early detection of lower‐urinary‐tract abnormalities. As the name implies, this instrument analyzes the spectrum of drops into which the urinary stream breaks up. As the drop spectra carry a “memory” of the passage the fluid has traversed, their statistics may be used to map the delicate tubes of the urinary system. Figure 1 shows how the output of the spectrometer clearly distinguished output from patients suffering from two different disease conditions from each other and from that of a normal individual. We will see how these clearly distinguishable differences arise, and how they form the basis for medical diagnosis.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. B. F. Clarke, R. Mielke, E. Leighton, J. Urol. 96, 417 (1966).

  2. 2. M. F. Campbell, Principles of Urology, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1957, page 101.

  3. 3. A. C. Guyton, Textbook of Medical Physiology, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1971, chapter 34.

  4. 4. G. Eckstein, The Body Has a Head, Harper and Row, New York, 1969, page 272.

  5. 5. M. F. Campbell, reference 2, page 105.

  6. 6. R. H. Flocks, Medical Times 92, 519 (1964).

  7. 7. M. F. Campbell, Urology, vol. 11, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1963, chapter 25 and references cited.

  8. 8. H. Gray, Anatomy of the Human Body, (C. M. Goss, ed.), Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1954, page 1370.

  9. 9. R. C. Ritter, N. R. Zinner, A. J. Paquin, J. Urol. 91, 161 (1964).

  10. 10. N. R. Zinner, Hydrodynamics of Micturition, (F. Hinman, S. Boyarsky, J. M. Pierce, N. R. Zinner, eds.), Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1971, chapter 22.

  11. 11. N. R. Zinner, R. C. Ritter, R. C. Sterling, D. C. Harding, Invest. Urol. 3, 379 (1969).https://doi.org/INURAQ

  12. 12. N. R. Zinner, R. C. Ritter, A. M. Sterling, D. C. Harding, J. Urol. 101, 914 (1969).

  13. 13. J. S. Lee, Y. C. Fung, Trans. of ASME Ser. E, 37, 9 (1970).

  14. 14. J. H. Forcester, D. F. Young, J. Biomechanics, 3, 297 (1970).https://doi.org/JBMCB5

  15. 15. D. F. Young, F. Y. Tsai, J. Biomechanics 6, 395 (1973).https://doi.org/JBMCB5

  16. 16. H. S. Lew, Y. C. Fung, J. Biomechanics 3, 23 (1970).https://doi.org/JBMCB5

  17. 17. G. A. Aiello, J. S. Trefil, University of Virginia Preprint (1973).

  18. 18. Lord Rayleigh, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 29, 71 (1879).

  19. 19. B. J. Meister, G. F. Scheele, AICHE Journal 13, 683 (1967).https://doi.org/AICEAC

  20. 20. R. E. Phinney, Phys. Fluids 16, 193 (1973).https://doi.org/PFLDAS

  21. 21. C. Weber, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 11, 136 (1931).https://doi.org/ZAMMAX

  22. 22. A. M. Sterling, PhD thesis, University of Washington (1969).

  23. 23. D. F. Rutland, G. J. Jameson, Chem. Eng. Science 25, 1689 (1970).https://doi.org/CESCAC

  24. 24. P. Lafrance, Phys. Fluids (to be published).

  25. 25. P. Lafrance, University of Virginia Preprint (1974).

  26. 26. P. Lafrance, G. Aiello, R. C. Ritter, J. S. Trefil, Phys. Fluids (to be published).

  27. 27. Urodynamics, (S. Boyarsky, C. W. Gottschalk, E. A. Tanagho, P. O. Zimskind, eds.), Academic, New York, 1971.

  28. 28. D. J. Griffiths, Brit. J. Urology 45, 497 (1973); https://doi.org/BJURAN
    D. J. Griffiths, Med. Biol. Eng. 9, 581 (1971).https://doi.org/MBENAU

More about the Authors

Gerald Aiello. Physics Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Pierre Lafrance. Physics Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Rogers C. Ritter. Physics Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

James S. Trefil. Physics Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1974_09.jpeg

Volume 27, Number 9

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.