The Theory of Bose–Einstein Condensation of Dilute Gases

DEC 01, 1999

Bose–Einstein condensates are an ideal testing ground for quantum field theory in real time and at finite temperatures—basic topics of great importance for diverse physical systems.

DOI: 10.1063/1.882899

Keith Burnett

Mark Edwards

Charles W. Clark

Bose‐Einstein condensation (BEC) has long been known to be a key element of macroscopic quantum phenomena such as superconductivity and superfluidity. BEC per se, however, eluded direct and unquestioned observation until 1995, when experimental groups produced condensates in dilute atomic alkali gases.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. M. H. Anderson et al., Science 269, 198 (1995). https://doi.org/SCIEAS
K. B. Davis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
C. C. Bradlev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
C. C. Bradley, C. A. Sackett, R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 985 (1997).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
2. F. Dalfovo et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999). https://doi.org/RMPHAT
A. S. Parkins, D. F. Walls, Phys. Rep. 303, 1 (1998). https://doi.org/PRPLCM
A. Griffin, D. W. Snoke, S. Stringari, eds., Bose—Einstein Condensation (Cambridge U. P., New York, 1995).
E. Arimondo, W. D. Phillips, F. Strumia, eds., Laser Manipulation of Atoms and Ions (North‐Holland, Amsterdam, 1992).
M. Inguscio, S. Stringari, C. Wieman, eds., Bose–Einstein Condensation in Atomic Gases (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1999).
See also the Georgia Southern University BEC bibliography on the web at http://amo.phy.gasou.edu/bec.html/bibliography.html.
3. V. Bagnato, D. E. Pritchard, D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. A 35, 4354 (1987).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
4. P. Navez et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1789 (1997). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
S. Grossman, M. Holthaus, Optics Express 1, 262 (1997).
C. Weiss, M. Wilkens, Optics Express 1, 272 (1997). https://doi.org/OPEXFF
M. E. Fisher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 653 (1997).https://doi.org/RMPHAT
5. M. Holland, J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. A 53, R1954 (1996).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
6. M. Edwards et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1671 (1996). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
D. S. Jin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 420 (1996).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
7. M.‐O. Mewes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 988 (1996).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
8. S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2360 (1996).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
9. P. A. Ruprecht et al., Phys. Rev. A 51, 4704 (1995). https://doi.org/PLRAAN
F. Dalfovo, S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2477 (1996). https://doi.org/PLRAAN
R. J. Dodd et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, 661 (1996).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
10. A. Griffin, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9341 (1996).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
11. D. S. Jin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 764 (1997). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
R. J. Dodd et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, R32 (1998).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
12. D. A. W. Hutchinson, R. J. Dodd, K. Burnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2198 (1998).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
13. J. Javanainen, S. M. Yoo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 161 (1996).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
14. See, for example, D. Jaksch et al., Phys. Rev. A 58, 1450 (1998), https://doi.org/PRLTAO
and references therein. Also see Yu. Kagan, B. V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3331 (1998).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
15. E. A. Burt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. J. Weiner, V. S. Bagnato, S. Zilio, P. S. Julienne, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1999 ().https://doi.org/RMPHAT

More about the Authors

Keith Burnett. University of Oxford, Oxford, England.

Mark Edwards. Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia.

Charles W. Clark. NIST's Gaithersburg facility.