Discover
/
Article

The teapot effect…a problem

SEP 01, 1956
Markus Reiner teaches applied mechanics at the Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, or the “Technion” as it is also known. By profession a civil engineer, he has worked as such for a whole lifetime—“doing science,” he explains, “as a hobby.” When Prof. Bingham of Lafayette College, Easton, Pa., learned about his work, he invited him to do research there, and Prof. Reiner spent two years (1931–1933) at Lafayette as research professor, cooperating with Bingham in the establishment of rheology as a new branch of physics. He is now head of Technion’s rheological laboratory, where he treats concrete as a liquid and air as a solid. He has recently designed and built a centripetal airpump based on the fact that, as foreseen by Maxwell, air can be considered as a viscoelastic solid with a time of relaxation of about 10−10 seconds.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3060089

Markus Reiner

As probably everybody has experienced to his or her dismay, when tea is poured out of a teapot, the jet, more often than not, has a tendency not to flow in a nice ballistic curve, as intended, into the cup, but to follow the underside of the spout, and soil the table cloth. Every physicist from a large number whose opinion I asked on the possible reason for this phenomenon, replied it must be due to surface tension or, in other terminology, capillary action or adhesion. Now, surface tension is one of the most nebulous terms of physics; many textbooks on the subject will tell the student that there is no such thing, and that the proper term is surface energy. We need not go into this question here, suffice it to say that when the physicist is pressed to express himself more clearly, he will say that this teapot effect is obviously due to the adhesion between the liquid (tea) and the solid (spout), and that the “phenomenon” was no problem and not worth another minute’s thought.

References

  1. 1. M. J. Lighthill, Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, No. 2105, Sept. (1945).

  2. 2. R. Bloch and M. Reiner, Bull. Res. Counc. Israel, 2, 263 (1952).https://doi.org/BRCIAU

  3. 3. M. Reiner, Bull. Res. Counc. Israel, 2, 265 (1952).https://doi.org/BRCIAU

More about the Authors

Markus Reiner. Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1956_09.jpeg

Volume 9, Number 9

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.