Discover
/
Article

The physics of white dwarfs

JAN 01, 1979
Increasingly sensitive and detailed astronomical observations coupled with calculations of the properties of matter under extreme conditions have given us new insights into their structure and evolution.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2995367

Hugh M. Van Horn

White dwarf stars, so called because of the color of the first few to be discovered, occupy a key position in astrophysical theory. Together with neutron stars and black holes, they are the terminal points of stellar evolution. Their properties thus provide clues to the physical processes that take place during the rapid and often spectacular evolutionary stages near the ends of stellar lifetimes. In addition, white dwarfs provide astrophysical “laboratories” for “measuring” the physical properties of matter under extreme conditions. These extend from conditions like those in laser‐produced plasmas to those typical of the solid crusts of neutron stars. White‐dwarf stars also occur as components of cataclysmic binary systems—novae, dwarf novae and related objects—and knowledge of the properties of white dwarfs is essential to the development of satisfactory theoretical models for these systems.

References

  1. 1. General background material on whitedwarf stars may be found in the following sources: S. Chandrasekhar, An Introduction on the Study of Stellar Structure, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago (1939);
    reprinted by Dover, New York (1957);
    E. Schatzman, White Dwarfs, North‐Holland, Amsterdam (1958);
    M. Schwarzschild, Structure and Evolution of the Stars, Princeton U.P., Princeton (1958), chapter 7;
    J. L. Greenstein, in Stars and Stellar Systems, vol. 6: Stellar Atmospheres (J. L. Greenstein, ed.), Univ. of Chicago, Chicago (1960), page 676;
    V. Weidemann, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 6, 351 (1968); https://doi.org/ARAAAJ
    J. P. Ostriker, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 9, 353 (1971), https://doi.org/ARAAAJ
    and H. M. Van Horn, in The Uncertainty Principle and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (W. C. Price and S. S. Chissick, eds.), Wiley, London (1977), page 441.

  2. 2. I. W. Lindenblad, Astron. J. 75, 841 (1970).https://doi.org/ANJOAA

  3. 3. L. Mestel, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 112, 583 (1952).https://doi.org/MNRAA4

  4. 4. W. Cash, S. Bowyer, M. Lampton, Astrophys. J. 221, L87 (1978).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  5. 5. J. L. Greenstein, J. B. Oke, H. L. Shipman, Astrophys. J. 169, 563 (1971).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  6. 6. M. P. Savedoff, H. M. Van Horn, F. Wesemael, L. H. Auer, T. P. Snow, D. G. York, Astrophys. J. 207, L45 (1976).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  7. 7. G. Fontaine, PhD thesis, University of Rochester (1973);
    G. Fontaine, H. C. Graboske, H. M. Van Horn, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 35, 293 (1977).https://doi.org/APJSA2

  8. 8. E. E. Salpeter, Astrophys. J. 134, 669 (1961); https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    T. Hamada, E. E. Salpeter, Astrophys. J. 134, 683 (1961).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  9. 9. S. G. Brush, H. L. Sahlin, E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 2102 (1966).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  10. 10. L. Mestel, M. Ruderman, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 136, 27 (1967); https://doi.org/MNRAA4
    H. M. Van Horn, Astrophys. J. 151, 227 (1968).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  11. 11. D. Q. Lamb, PhD thesis, University of Rochester (1974);
    D. Q. Lamb, H. M. Van Horn, Astrophys. J. 200, 306 (1975); https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    G. Shaviv, A. Kovetz, Astron. Astrophys. 51, 383 (1976).https://doi.org/AAEJAF

  12. 12. J. C. Kemp, J. Swedlund, J. D. Landstreet, J. R. P. Angel, Astrophys. J. 161, L77 (1970).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  13. 13. J. R. P. Angel, Astrophys. J. 216, 1 (1977); https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    also J. R. P. Angel, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 16, (1978), in press.https://doi.org/ARAAAJ

  14. 14. A. U. Landolt, Astrophys. J. 153, 151 (1968).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  15. 15. J. T. McGraw, PhD thesis, University of Texas (Austin), (1977).

  16. 16. Y. Osaki, C. J. Hansen, Astrophys. J. 185, 277 (1973); https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    A. J. Brickhill, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 170, 405 (1975); https://doi.org/MNRAA4
    W. Dziembowski, Acta Astron. 27, 1 (1977).https://doi.org/AASWAM

  17. 17. J. S. Gallagher, S. G. Starrfield, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 16, (1978), in press.https://doi.org/ARAAAJ

More about the Authors

Hugh M. Van Horn. University of Rochester.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1979_01.jpeg

Volume 32, Number 1

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.