The Physics of Metal Clusters

DEC 01, 1990

Theorists and experimenters find that small aggregates of metal atoms exhibit a shell structure like that of atomic nuclei. With this knowledge they hope to determine which properties define ‘metallic’ over the range from atom to bulk.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881220

Marvin L. Cohen

Walter D. Knight

Scientists often set the stage for their most productive advances by first developing simple models, even when sophisticated first‐principles tools are available. These models usually originate from the necessity to explain experimental observations. If the models are robust, then a variety of data fall into place, and successful predictions are made. If a model is “correct,” it is eventually found to be consistent with or derivable from fundamental theory. The Bohr model for atoms is a prime example. Ernest Rutherford’s experiments showed that J. J. Thomson’s “plum pudding” model of an atom, consisting of a positive spherical “pudding” embedded with negative electron “plums,” had to be replaced by Rutherford’s nuclear picture, and subsequent optical data led to the Bohr model. Eventually quantum theory confirmed that the Bohr model is an excellent rudimentary representation for an atom. Although it has been superseded by more elaborate quantum theoretical approaches, this model is still taught to students of atomic physics because of the physical insight one gains by using the Bohr picture of an atom.

References

1. General references include W. A. de Heer, W. D. Knight, M. Y. Chou, M. L. Cohen, Solid State Phys. 40, 93 (1987); https://doi.org/SSPHAE
M. L. Cohen, M. Y. Chou, W. D. Knight, W. A. de Heer, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 3141 (1987).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
2. M. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 78, 16 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
3. W. D. Knight, K. Clemenger, W. A. de Heer, W. A. Saunders, M. Y. Chou, M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2141 (1984).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
4. K. Clemenger, Phys. Rev. B 32, 1359 (1985).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
5. E. C. Honea, M. L. Homer, J. L. Persson, R. L. Whetten, Chem. Phys. Lett., (in press).
6. H. Nishioka, K. Hansen, B. R. Mottelson, Z. Phys. C (in press).
7. C. Brechignac, P. Cahouzac, J. Leygnier, J. Weiner, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1492 (1989).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
8. W. A. Saunders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3046 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
9. K. E. Schriver, J. L. Persson, E. C. Honea, R. L. Whetten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2539 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
10. O. Cheshnovsky, K. J. Taylor, J. Conceicao, R. E. Smalley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1785 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
11. W. Ekardt, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6360 (1985).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
12. K. Selby, M. Vollmer, J. Masui, V. Kresin, W. A. de Heer, W. D. Knight, Phys. Rev. B 40, 5417 (1989).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
13. C. Yannouleas, R. A. Broglia, M. Brack, P. F. Bortignon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 255 (1989).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
14. J. M. Pacheco, R. A. Broglia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1400 (1989).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
15. T. Bergmann, T. P. Martin, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 2848 (1989).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
16. W. A. de Heer, P. Milani, Phys. Rev. (in press).
17. M. L. Cohen, Phys. Scr. T1, 5 (1982).https://doi.org/PHSTBO
18. N. D. Lang, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B 12, 4555 (1970).https://doi.org/PLRBAQ
19. A. N. Cleland, M. L. Cohen, Solid State Commun. 55, 35 (1985).https://doi.org/SSCOA4
20. S. B. Zhang, M. L. Cohen, M. Y. Chou, Phys. Rev. B 36, 3455 (1987).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
21. M. S. Hybertsen, S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390 (1986).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
22. S. Saito, S. B. Zhang, S. G. Louie, M. L. Cohen, J. Phys. C (in press).
23. T. P. Martin, T. Bergmann, H. Gölich, T. Lange, Chem. Phys. Lett. 172, 209 (1990).https://doi.org/CHPLBC

More about the Authors

Marvin L. Cohen. University of California, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

Walter D. Knight. University of California, Berkeley.