The physics of medical imaging

JUL 01, 1983

Images computed from x‐ray absorption, from positron emission, from nuclear magnetic resonance and from reflections of ultrasound are showing tissues and details unimagined 25 years ago.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2915743

Paul R. Moran

R. Jerome Nickles

James A. Zagzebski

The growth in the applications of physics to medicine is perhaps best illustrated by the developments in medical imaging. When AAPM was founded, medical imaging consisted primarily of x‐ray fluoroscopy (direct images) and radiography (exposures on film). Although these techniques still dominate the work of a radiology department, there are a number of new ways of making images of the interior of the living body. (See, for example, the cover of this issue and figure 1.) Many of these new imaging methods depend on computers to perform the enormous amounts of data‐analysis required—computed tomography or nmr imaging, for example, would not be possible without computers—and in many other cases computers serve to provide enhanced images that may allow more accurate diagnoses.

References

1. C. A. Mistretta, Opt. Eng. 13, March/April 1974, page 134.https://doi.org/OPEGAR
2. E. Rubenstein, E. B. Huges, et al., Proc. Soc. Photo‐Opt. Instrum. Eng. 314, 42 (1981).https://doi.org/SPIECJ
3. M. S. Van Lysel, J. T. Dobbins III, W. W. Peppier, et al., Radiology, to be published;
G. S. Keyes, S. J. Riederer, B. J. Belandger, W. R. Brody, Proc. Soc. Photo‐Opt. Instrum, Eng. 347, 34 (1982).
4. R. A. Kruger, J. A. Nelson et al., presented at 68th Ann. Mtg. RSNA, Chicago, Ill, 28 November 1982.
5. G. N. Hounsfield, Br. J. Radiol. 46, 1016 (1973); https://doi.org/BJRAAP
G. N. Hounsfield, Med. Phys. 7, 283 (1980); https://doi.org/MPHYA6
A. M. Cormack, Med. Phys. 7, 273 (1980).https://doi.org/MPHYA6
6. P. C. Lauterbur, Nature 242, 190 (1973);
P. C. Lauterbur, Pure App. Chem. 40, 149 (1974).
7. R. Damadian, Science 171, 1151 (1971).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
8. M. E. Phelps, E. J. Hoffman, N. A. Mullani, M. M. Ter‐Pogossian, J. Nucl. Med. 16, 210 (1975).https://doi.org/JNMEAQ
9. M. M. Per‐Pogossian, N. A. Mullani, D. C. Ficke, J. Markham, D. L. Synder, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 5, 277 (1981).https://doi.org/JCATD5
10. B. M. Gallagher, J. S. Fowler, N. I. Gutterson, R. R. MacGregor, C.‐N. Wan, A. P. Wolf, J. Nucl. Med. 19, 1154 (1978).https://doi.org/JNMEAQ
11. T. Jones, D. A. Chesler, M. M. Ter‐Pogossian, Br. J. Radiol. 49, 339 (1976).https://doi.org/BJRAAP
12. G. D. Hutchins, R. J. Nickles, Proc. XI Int. Symp. Cereb. Blood Flow and Metab. (in press).
13. R. C. Sanders, A. E. James, eds., Ultrasonography in Obstertics and Gynecology, 2nd ed., Appleton‐Century‐Crofts, New York (1980).
14. W. J. Zwiebel, ed. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography, Grune‐Stratton, New York (1982).
15. M. Linzer, ed., Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization II, National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 525 (1979).
16. J. F. Greenleaf, S. K. Kenue, B. Rajagopolan, R. C. Bahn, et al., in Acoustic Imaging, A. F. Metherell, ed., Plenum, New York (1980), vol. 8, page 599.
17. P. N. T. Wells, AAPM Medical Physics Monograph 6, G. Fullerton, J. Zagzebski, ed., AIP, New York (1980).
18. E. L. Madsen, J. A. Zagzebski, M. F. Insana, T. M. Burke, G. Frank, Medical Phys. 9, 703 (1982); https://doi.org/MPHYA6
D. Nicholas, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 8, 17 (1982).https://doi.org/USMBA3

More about the Authors

Paul R. Moran. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

R. Jerome Nickles. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

James A. Zagzebski. University of Wisconsin, Madison.