Discover
/
Article

The method of successive oscillatory fields

JUL 01, 1980
An extension of Rabi’s molecular‐beam resonance method, originally devised for measuring nuclear magnetic moments, is proving useful also for microwave spectroscopy, masers and lasers.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2914161

Norman F. Ramsey

In 1949 I was looking for a way to measure nuclear magnetic moments by the molecular‐beam resonance method, but to do it more accurately than was possible with the arrangement developed by I. I. Rabi and his colleagues at Columbia University. The method I found was that of separated oscillatory fields, in which the single oscillating magnetic field in the center of a Rabi device is replaced by two oscillating fields at the entrance and exit, respectively, of the space in which the nuclear magnetic moments are to be investigated. During the 1950’s this method became extensively used in the original form. In the same period more general applications of the method arose, and the principal extensions included:

▸ Use of relative phase shifts between the two oscillatory fields

▸ Extension generally to other resonance and spectroscopic devices, such as masers, which depend on either absorption or stimulated emission

▸ Separation of oscillatory fields in time instead of space

▸ Use of more than two successive oscillatory fields

▸ General variation of amplitudes and phases of the successive applied oscillatory fields.

References

  1. 1. N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 76, 996 (1949).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  2. 2. N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 78, 695 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. N. F. Ramsey, H. B. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. 84, 506 (1951).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. N. F. Ramsey, Rev. Sci. Instr. 28, 57 (1957).

  5. 5. N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 109, 822 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  6. 6. Y. V. Baklanov, B. V. Dubetsky, V. B. Chebotsev, Appl. Phys. 9, 171 (1976)
    and Y. V. Baklanov, B. V. Dubetsky, V. B. Chebotsev, 11, 201 (1976).https://doi.org/APHYCC , Appl. Phys.

  7. 7. J. C. Bergquist, S. A. Lee, J. L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 159 (1977)
    and J. C. Bergquist, S. A. Lee, J. L. Hall, Laser Spectroscopy III, 142 (1978).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  8. 8. M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 757 (1977),
    M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Laser Spectroscopy III, 135 (1978),
    M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Appl. Phys. 15, 119 (1978)
    and M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. A17, 614 (1978).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  9. 9. C. J. Bordé, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 284B, 101 (1977).

  10. 10. T. W. Hänsch, Laser Spectroscopy III, 149 (1978).

  11. 11. V. P. Chebotayev, A. V. Shishayev, B. Y. Yurshin, L. S. Vasilenko, N. M. Dyuba, M. I. Skortsov, Appl. Phys. 15, 43, 219and 319 (1987).

  12. 12. S. R. Lundeen, P. E. Jessop, F. M. Pipkin, Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 377 and (1975).

  13. 13. N. F. Ramsey, Molecular Beams, Oxford University Press (1956).

  14. 14. N. F. Ramsey, Le Journal de Physique et Radium 19, 809 (1958).

  15. 15. N. F. Ramsey, in Recent Research in Molecular Beams (I. Estermann, ed.) Academic Press, New York (1958); page 107.

  16. 16. F. Bloch, A. Siegert, Phys. Rev. 57, 522 (1940).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  17. 17. N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 100, 1191 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  18. 18. J. H. Shirley, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 783 (1963).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  19. 19. R. F. Code, N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. A 4, 1945 (1971).

  20. 20. G. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 18, 1057 (1978).

  21. 21. N. F. Ramsey, H. B. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. 84, 506 (1951).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  22. 22. E. E. Uzgiris, N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. A1, 429 (1970).

  23. 23. V. F. Ezhov, S. N. Ivanov, I. M. Lobashov, V. A. Nazarenko, G. D. Porsev, A. P. Serebrov, R. R. Toldaev, Sov. Phys–JETP 24, 39 (1976).

  24. 24. S. Jarvis, Jr., D. J. Wineland, H. Hellwig, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 5336 (1977).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

More about the Authors

Norman F. Ramsey. Harvard University.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1980_07.jpeg

Volume 33, Number 7

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.