An extension of Rabi’s molecular‐beam resonance method, originally devised for measuring nuclear magnetic moments, is proving useful also for microwave spectroscopy, masers and lasers.
In 1949 I was looking for a way to measure nuclear magnetic moments by the molecular‐beam resonance method, but to do it more accurately than was possible with the arrangement developed by I. I. Rabi and his colleagues at Columbia University. The method I found was that of separated oscillatory fields, in which the single oscillating magnetic field in the center of a Rabi device is replaced by two oscillating fields at the entrance and exit, respectively, of the space in which the nuclear magnetic moments are to be investigated. During the 1950’s this method became extensively used in the original form. In the same period more general applications of the method arose, and the principal extensions included:
▸ Use of relative phase shifts between the two oscillatory fields
▸ Extension generally to other resonance and spectroscopic devices, such as masers, which depend on either absorption or stimulated emission
▸ Separation of oscillatory fields in time instead of space
▸ Use of more than two successive oscillatory fields
▸ General variation of amplitudes and phases of the successive applied oscillatory fields.
6. Y. V. Baklanov, B. V. Dubetsky, V. B. Chebotsev, Appl. Phys. 9, 171 (1976) and Y. V. Baklanov, B. V. Dubetsky, V. B. Chebotsev, 11, 201 (1976).https://doi.org/APHYCC, Appl. Phys.
7. J. C. Bergquist, S. A. Lee, J. L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 159 (1977) and J. C. Bergquist, S. A. Lee, J. L. Hall, Laser Spectroscopy III, 142 (1978).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
8. M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 757 (1977), M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Laser Spectroscopy III, 135 (1978), M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Appl. Phys. 15, 119 (1978) and M. M. Salour, C. Cohen‐Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. A17, 614 (1978).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
9. C. J. Bordé, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 284B, 101 (1977).
10. T. W. Hänsch, Laser Spectroscopy III, 149 (1978).
11. V. P. Chebotayev, A. V. Shishayev, B. Y. Yurshin, L. S. Vasilenko, N. M. Dyuba, M. I. Skortsov, Appl. Phys. 15, 43, 219and 319 (1987).
12. S. R. Lundeen, P. E. Jessop, F. M. Pipkin, Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 377 and (1975).
13. N. F. Ramsey, Molecular Beams, Oxford University Press (1956).
14. N. F. Ramsey, Le Journal de Physique et Radium 19, 809 (1958).
15. N. F. Ramsey, in Recent Research in Molecular Beams (I. Estermann, ed.) Academic Press, New York (1958); page 107.
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
November 10, 2025 10:22 AM
This Content Appeared In
Volume 33, Number 7
Get PT in your inbox
PT The Week in Physics
A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.
One email per week
PT New Issue Alert
Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.
One email per month
PT Webinars & White Papers
The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.