Discover
/
Article

The Coupled Cluster Method

MAR 01, 1987
Decomposing the wavefunction of a many‐particle system in terms of amplitudes for exciting clusters of a finite number of particles yields a versatile and high‐precision tool of many‐body theory.
Raymond F. Bishop
Hermann G. Kümmel

Liquids and solids, atoms and molecules, nuclei—all these clearly are interacting many‐body systems. Even a nucleon may be regarded as a manyparticle system, not just because it is now known to consist of three quarks interacting via gluons, but because of the possibility in quantum field theory of virtual excitation of many particles from the vacuum. in the table page 56 we list some of the many‐particle systems we encounter in the physical world at length scales that range from a few centimeters to a few fermis. Many of these systems exhibit phenomena—superconductivity in solids and fission in nuclei, for example—whose understanding does not follow immediately from knowledge of the constituents of the system and the interactions among the constituents, but requires new concepts and ideas. Many‐body physics is the branch of theoretical physics that studies the new phenomena or “emergent properties” that arise from interactions among “elementary” constituents of a many‐particle system and provides means and methods for carrying out precise calculations of such characteristic properties of these systems as may be compared with experimental results to verify hypotheses about the nature of the constituents and their interactions.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. For example, see G. E. Brown, M. Rho, PHYSICS TODAY, February 1983, p. 24.

  2. 2. For reviews of the CCM see H. Kümmel, K. H. Lührmann, J. G. Zabolitzky, Phys. Rep. 36C, 1 (1978); https://doi.org/PRPLCM
    V. Kvasnička, V. Laurinc, S. Biskupič, Phys. Rep. 90, 160 (1982); https://doi.org/PRPLCM
    H. Kümmel, in Nucleon‐Nucleon Interaction and Nuclear Many‐Body Problems, S. S. Wu, T. T. S. Kuo, eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1984), p. 46;
    R. F. Bishop, in Nucleon‐Nucleon Interaction and Nuclear Many‐Body Problems, S. S. Wu, T. T. S. Kuo, eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1984), p. 604;
    J. Arponen, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 151, 311 (1983).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  3. 3. F. Coester, Nucl. Phys. 7, 421 (1958). https://doi.org/NUPHA7
    F. Coester, H. Kummel, Nucl. Phys. 17, 477 (1960).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  4. 4. See, for example, A. L. Fetter, J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many‐Particle Systems, McGraw‐Hill, New York (1971);
    D. J. Thouless, The Quantum Mechanics of Many‐Body Systems, Academic, New York (1961).

  5. 5. J. Čižek, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 4256 (1966); https://doi.org/JCPSA6
    J. Čižek, Adv. Chem. Phys. 14, 35 (1969).https://doi.org/ADCPAA

  6. 6. J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 240, 539 (1957).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  7. 7. See, for example, S. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, Harper and Row, New York (1964).

  8. 8. J. E. Mayer, M. G. Mayer, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York (1977).

  9. 9. J. Goldstone, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 239, 267 (1957).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  10. 10. R. F. Bishop, K. H. Lührmann, Phys. Rev. B 17, 3757 (1978); https://doi.org/PLRBAQ
    R. F. Bishop, K. H. Lührmann, Phys. Rev. B 26, 5523 (1982). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    K. Emrich, J. G. Zabolitzky, Phys. Rev. B 30, 2049 (1984).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  11. 11. K. Szalewicz, J. G. Zabolitzky, B. Jeziorski, H. J. Monkhorst, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 2723 (1984).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  12. 12. W. D. Laidig, G. D. Purvis, R. J. Bartlett, J. Phys. Chem. 89, 2161 (1985).https://doi.org/JPCHAX

  13. 13. J. G. Zabolitzky, M. H. Kalos, Nucl. Phys. A 356, 114 (1981).https://doi.org/NUPABL

  14. 14. C. S. Hsue, J. L. Chern, Phys. Rev. D 29, 643 (1984).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  15. 15. W. D. Glöckle, The Quantum Mechanical Few‐Body Problem, Springer‐Verlag, Heidelberg (1983).

More about the Authors

Raymond F. Bishop. Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, England.

Hermann G. Kümmel. Institute for Theoretical Physics, Ruhr‐Universität Bochum, Bochum, West Germany.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1987_03.jpeg

Volume 40, Number 3

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.