Discover
/
Article

The Birth of the Solid‐State Physics Community

JUL 01, 1988
When it seemed likely that APS would be fragmented into groups with special interests, a few thoughtful people were able to sway the balance in favor of unity; in the process, the solid‐state physics community was born.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881124

In 1930 solid‐state physics did not exist. The very term was unknown; nor was there any intellectual or social entity to which the term could have applied. Certainly there flourished a number of specialties—for example, the electron theory of metals—that would eventually fall within the field of solid‐state physics. However, there was no feeling that physicists who studied solids should be distinguished as a group from those who studied gas spectra, for instance, or nuclear reactions. Thirty years later the situation had entirely changed. The term “solid‐state physics” not only was familiar in 1960, but could be attached to a number of institutions: university chairs, journals, research groups and even buildings devoted entirely to the subject.

References

  1. 1. F. Seitz, R. P. Johnson, J. Appl. Phys. 8, 84, 186 (1937).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  2. 2. S. R. Weart, in The Sciences in the American Context: New Perspectives, Nathan Reingold, ed., Smithsonian Inst. P., Washington, D.C. (1979), p. 295.

  3. 3. Proceedings and minutes of The American Physical Society, 1930–31, records of The American Physical Society, New York.

  4. 4. P. P. Ewald, Nature 154, 628 (1944).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  5. 5. K. K. Darrow, J. Appl. Phys. 14, 437 (1943).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  6. 6. F. Seitz to R. Smoluchowski, 29 November 1943. and other materials, records of The American Physical Society Division of Solid State Physics, Niels Bohr Library, American Institute of Physics, New York.

  7. 7. Letter of Committee of Six, January 1944; W. Davey to R. Smoluchowski, 28 January 1944, records of The American Physical Society Division of Solid State Physics.

  8. 8. J. Van Vleck to R. Smoluchowski, 29 January 1944; Smoluchowski’s reply, 3 February 1944; Van Vleck’s reply, 16 February 1944, records of The American Physical Society Division of Solid State Physics.

  9. 9. R. Smoluchowski to K. K. Darrow, 25 April 1944, records of The American Physical Society Division of Solid State Physics.
    K. K. Darrow, J. Appl. Phys. 14, 437 (1943).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  10. 10. F. Seitz to K. K. Darrow, 6 May 1944; Darrow’s reply, 16 May 1944; Seitz’s reply, 25 May 1944, records of The American Physical Society Division of Solid State Physics.

  11. 11. L. Brillouin to R. Smoluchowski, 25 January 1944; C. Herring to R. Smoluchowski, 13 February 1944, records of The American Physical Society Division of Solid State Physics.

  12. 12. F. Seitz to R. Smoluchowski, 3 March 1944, 22 May 1944, 14 June 1944, and other letters, records of The American Physical Society Division of Solid State Physics.

  13. 13. Council minutes of The American Physical Society, 270th meeting, January 1946, records of The American Physical Society, New York.

  14. 14. Council minutes of The American Physical Society, 270th through 279th meetings, records of The American Physical Society, New York.

  15. 15. Interview of F. Seitz by S. R. Weart, October 1982, Niels Bohr Library, American Institute of Physics, New York.

  16. 16. K. K. Darrow, Phys. Rev. 91, 428 (1953).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

More about the Authors

Spencer R. Weart. American Institute of Physics.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1988_07.jpeg

Volume 41, Number 7

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.