The birth of elementary‐particle physics
DOI: 10.1063/1.2915009
By 1930, relativity and quantum mechanics were established, yet the excitement of the new physics was far from over. Indeed, the next half‐century was characterized by startling experimental and theoretical discoveries and by new puzzles that appeared wherever one looked.
References
1. H. Steuwer, ed., Nuclear Physics in Retrospect; Proceedings of a Symposium on the 1930s, U. of Minnesota P., Minneapolis (1979).
2. W. Kolhörster, Naturwiss. 16, 1044 (1928); https://doi.org/NATWAY
W. Bothe and W. Kolhörster, Naturwiss. 16, 1045 (1928).https://doi.org/NATWAY3. D. Skobeltzyn, Z. f. Phys. 43, 354 (1927);
D. Skobeltzyn, 54, 686 (1929).4. C. D. Anderson, Science, 76, 238 (1932); https://doi.org/SCIEAS
S. H. Neddermeyer, C. D. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 51, 884 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO5. P. M. S. Blackett, G. P. S. Occhialini, Proc. Roy. Soc. A139, 699 (1933).
6. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A114, 243 (1927).
7. P. Jordan, E. Wigner, Z. f. Phys. 47, 631 (1928).
8. Gregor Wentzel, in Theoretical Physics in the Twentiety Century, M. Fierz, V. F. Weisskopf, eds., Interscience, New York (1960).
9. W. Heisenberg, W. Pauli, Z. f. Phys. 56, 1 (1929);
W. Heisenberg, W. Pauli, 59, 168 (1930), Part II.10. O. Klein, Y. Nishina, Z. f. Phys. 52, 853 (1929).
11. H. Bethe, W. Heitler, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A146, 83 (1934). (Italics of Bethe and Heitler.)
12. E. J. Williams, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A139, 163 (1933);
E. J. Williams, Phys. Rev. 45, 729 (1934); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
K. Danske, Vid. Selskab (Math.‐Phys. Meddelelser) 13, No. 4, 1 (1935);
C. F. von Weizsäcker, Z. f. Phys. 88, 612 (1934).13. H. J. Bhabha, W. Heitler, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A159, 432 (1937);
J. F. Carlson, J. R. Oppenheimer, Phys. Rev. 51, 220 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO14. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys.‐Math. Soc. Japan 17, 48 (1935).https://doi.org/PPMJAJ
15. J. R. Oppenheimer, R. Serber, Phys. Rev. 51, 1113 (1937); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Phys. Rev. 52, 41 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO16. N. Kemmer, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 34, 354 (1938).https://doi.org/PCPSA4
17. P. M. S. Blackett, J. G. Wilson, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A160, 304 (1937).
18. J. Crussard, L. Leprince‐Ringuet, Compt. rend. 204, 240 (1937); https://doi.org/COREAF
P. Auger, P. EhrenfestJr., Journ. de Phys. 6, 255 (1935).19. J. C. Street, E. C. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. 51, 1005 (1937); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
Y. Nishina, M. Takeuchi, T. Ichimiya, Phys. Rev. 52, 1198 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO20. M. Conversi, E. Pancini, O. Piccioni, Phys. Rev. 71, 209 (1947).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
21. C. M. G. Lattes, H. Muirhead, G. P. S. Occhialini, C. F. Powell, Nature 159, 694 (1947).https://doi.org/NATUAS
22. S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 515 (1980); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
A. Salam, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 525 (1980); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
S. L. Glashow, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 539 (1980).https://doi.org/RMPHAT23. S. Hawking, Is the End in Sight for Theoretical Physics, Cambridge U.P., New York (1980).
24. R. A. Millikan, Electrons, Cambridge U.P., New York (1935), page 320.
More about the Authors
Laurie M. Brown. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Lillian Hoddeson. University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign.