Discover
/
Article

Systematic errors in physical constants

SEP 01, 1961
The author is a consultant to the National Bureau of Standards on the statistical and mathematical design of experiments in physics, chemistry, and engineering. Dr. Youden joined NBS in 1948.
W. J. Youden

Physicists today make very little use of statistical techniques. There was good reason for the minor role so long accorded the statistical evaluation of the errors in physical constants. When two laboratories make independent determinations, each may attach to its “best” value a ± sign followed by an estimate s of the error. This estimate of the error is often based upon a series of observations made under carefully controlled conditions. Experimenters soon discovered that if laboratories A and B reported values CA and CB for the same constant, the difference Δ between CA and CB was almost always a large multiple of the estimated error sa (or sb). Obviously these calculated errors had no more to do with the real errors than the neatness of the laboratory or the promptness with which the investigator answered his mail.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. P. W. Bridgman, “Critique of critical tables”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 46, 1394 (1960).https://doi.org/PNASA6

  2. 2. H. Preston‐Thomas, L. G. Turnbull, E. Green, T. M. Dauphiness, and S. N. Kalra, “An absolute measurement of the acceleration due to gravity”, Ottawa Division of Applied Physics, National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada.

  3. 3. N. E. Dorsey, “The velocity of light”, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. 34, 1 (1944).https://doi.org/TAPSAY

  4. 4. N. E Dorsey and C. Eisenhart, “On absolute measurements”, Sci. Monthly 77, 103 (1953).https://doi.org/KHYKD8

  5. 5. F. Yates, “Complex experiments”, Suppl. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 2, 181 (1935).

  6. 6. H. Hotelling, “Some problems in weighing and other experimental techniques”, Ann. Math. Stat. 15, 297 (1944).https://doi.org/AASTAD

  7. 7. O. Kempthorne “The factorial approach to the weighing problem”, Ann. Math. Stat. 19, 238 (1948).https://doi.org/AASTAD

  8. 8. K. Kishen, “On the design of experiments for weighing and making other types of measurements”, Ann. Math. Stat. 16, 294 (1945).https://doi.org/AASTAD

  9. 9. A. M. Mood, “On Hotelling’s weighing problem”, Ann. Math. Stat. 17, 432 (1946).https://doi.org/AASTAD

  10. 10. R. I. Plackett and J. P. Burman, “The design of optimum multifactorial experiments”, Biometrika 33, 305 (1946).https://doi.org/BIOKAX

More about the authors

W. J. Youden, National Bureau of Standards.

Related content
/
Article
A half century after the discovery of Hawking radiation, we are still dealing with the quantum puzzle it exposed.
/
Article
Since the discovery was first reported in 1999, researchers have uncovered many aspects of the chiral-induced spin selectivity effect, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
/
Article
Metrologists are using fundamental physics to define units of measure. Now NIST has developed new quantum sensors to measure and realize the pascal.
/
Article
Nanoscale, topologically protected whirlpools of spins have the potential to move from applications in spintronics into quantum science.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1961_09.jpeg

Volume 14, Number 9

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.