Discover
/
Article

Synchrotron radiation research—An overview

JUN 01, 1983
An incisive research tool is shedding new light on difficult problems in fields ranging from biology to physics, prompting a major expansion of source facilities.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2915705

Arthur Bienenstock
Herman Winick

Synchrotron radiation, with its remarkable properties and eminent suitability for scientific and technical applications, is having a profound effect on the many disciplines that make use of radiation in the x‐ray and vacuum ultraviolet regions of the spectrum. Indeed, the rapidly increasing availability of this radiation is revolutionizing some fields and is leading to a variety of new interdisciplinary collaborations. Seeking to take advantage of this incisive tool, scientists around the world are requesting time at synchrotron radiation facilities in such large numbers that the fast‐paced construction of new sources—including several in less‐developed countries—has yet to bring the level of availability up to that of demand.

References

  1. 1. PHYSICS TODAY, May 1981, is a special issue on synchrotron radiation, containing the following articles: E. M. Rowe, Facilities in the United States; C. J. Sparks Jr, Research with x rays; H. Winick, G. Brown, K. Halbach, J. Harris, Wiggler and undulator magnets; D. E. Eastman, F. J. Himpsel, Ultraviolet radiation—an incisive and versatile tool.

  2. 2. E. Koch, Handbook on Synchrotron Radiation, Volume I, North Holland, Amsterdam (to be published, 1983).

  3. 3. H. Winick, S. Doniach, eds., Synchrotron Radiation Research, Plenum, New York (1980).

  4. 4. C. Kunz, ed., Topics in Current Physics—Synchrotron Radiation, Techniques and Applications, Springer‐Verlag, New York (1979).

  5. 5. Solid State Sciences Committee, National Academy of Sciences, Current Status of Facilities Dedicated to the Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 1983 report, D W. Lynch, chairman, Available from: Solid State Sciences Comm., NAS, 2101 Constitution Ave., Washington, DC 20418.

  6. 6. Proc. Second Int. Conference on EXAFS and Near‐Edge Structure, Frascati, 1982, Springer‐Verlag, New York (1983).

  7. 7. J. Phillips, A. Wlodawer, M. Yevitz, K. Hodgson, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 73, 128 (1976).

  8. 8. P. H. Fuoss, P. Eisenberger, W. K. Warburton, A. Bienenstock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1537 (1981).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  9. 9. P. Eisenberger, W. C. Marra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1081 (1981).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  10. 10. W. F. Brinkman, D. S. Fisher, D. E. Moncton, Science 217, 693 (1982), a review.https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  11. 11. B. C. Larson, C. W. White, T. S. Noggle, D. Mills, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 337 (1982).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. G. B. Stephenson, PhD dissertation, Stanford University, 1982, to be published.

  13. 13. M. H. Hecht, I. Lindau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 821 (1981).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  14. 14. S. Southworth, C. M. Trnesdale, P. H. Kobrin, D. W. Lindle, W. D. Brewer, D. A. Shirley, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 143 (1982).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  15. 15. D. Thompson, R. Coisson, J. LeDuff, F. Dupont, M. Ericksson, A. Hofmann, D. Husmann, G. Mulhaupt, M. Poole, M. Renard, M. Sommer, V. Suller, S. Tazzari, F. Wang, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐28, 3153 (1981).https://doi.org/IETNAE

  16. 16. Advanced Light Source Design Group, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐30 (to be published, August 1983).

  17. 17. H. Winick, H. Wiedemann, I. Lindau, K. Hodgson, K. Halbach, J. Cerino, A. Bienenstock, R. Bachrach, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐30 (to be published, August 1983).https://doi.org/IETNAE

  18. 18. S. Krinsky, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐30 (to be published, August 1983).https://doi.org/IETNAE

  19. 19. G. Brown, K. Halbach, J. Harris, H. Winick, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 208, 65 (1983).

  20. 20. K. Halbach, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 187, 109 (1981).

  21. 21. R. P. Phizakerly, Z. U. Rek, G. B. Stephenson, S. D. Conradson, K. O. Hodgson, T. Matsushita, H. Oyangy, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 16, 220 (1983).https://doi.org/JACGAR

More about the Authors

Arthur Bienenstock. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.

Herman Winick. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1983_06.jpeg

Volume 36, Number 6

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.