Structure analysis of solid surfaces

OCT 01, 1975

Discrepancies that had cast doubt on the value of low‐energy electron diffraction as a tool for defining the positions of surface atoms have been resolved, and new techniques are enhancing its usefulness.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2998917

Thor N. Rhodin

David S. Y. Tong

An accident that occurred at Bell Laboratories in 1925 started Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer on an historical series of experiments. While studying the backscattering of slow electrons from a polycrystalline nickel target, they observed that the angular distribution of the electrons changed completely when the surface was inadvertently oxidized at a high temperature. The consequent study of diffraction phenomena in electrons scattered from the (111) face of a nickel crystal confirmed the de Broglie hypothesis of the wave nature of electrons. But Davisson and Germer also predicted that this type of experiment would provide a valuable approach to the important problem of defining the precise position of atoms in the surfaces of crystalline solids. This suggestion has been pursued diligently by scientists both in the US and abroad. Now, fifty years after Davisson and Germer demonstrated the coherent scattering of electrons by a crystalline solid, the goal of studying surface structure with this technique is becoming a reality. In this article we will discuss some of the major advances of the past few years that are making this achievement possible.

References

1. C. Davisson, L. Germer, Nature 119, 558 (1927).https://doi.org/NATUAS
2. PHYSICS TODAY, March 1974, page 17.
3. P. Estrup, PHYSICS TODAY, April 1975, page 33.
4. S. Andersson, J. B. Pendry, B. Kasemo, M. Van Hove, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 595 (1973); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
J. E. Demuth, D. W. Jepsen, P. M. Marcus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 540 (1973); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
C. B. Duke, N. O. Lipari, G. E. Laramore, J. B. Theeten, Solid State Comm. 13, 579 (1973).https://doi.org/SSCOA4
5. J. E. Demuth, T. N. Rhodin, Surf. Sci. 42, 261 (1974); https://doi.org/SUSCAS
J. E. Demuth, T. N. Rhodin, 45, 249 (1974).https://doi.org/SUSCAS , Surf. Sci.
6. M. Van Hove, S. Y. Tong, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 12, 230 (1975).https://doi.org/JVSTAL
7. S. Y. Tong, in Progress in Surface Science (S. G. Davison, ed.) Pergamon, New York, volume 7, part 2 (1975).
8. S. Wakoh, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 20, 1894 (1965).https://doi.org/JUPSAU
9. S. Andersson, J. B. Pendry, Solid State Comm. 16, 563 (1975); https://doi.org/SSCOA4
J. E. Demuth, D. W. Jepsen, P. M. Marcus, J. Phys. C 8, 8 (1975).https://doi.org/JPSOAW
10. J. E. Demuth, D. W. Jepsen, P. M. Marcus, Surf. Sci. 45, 733 (1974).https://doi.org/SUSCAS
11. C. B. Duke, N. O. Lipari, G. E. Laramore, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11, 180 (1974).https://doi.org/JVSTAL
12. C. B. Duke, N. O. Lipari, G. E. Laramore, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 12, 222 (1975).https://doi.org/JVSTAL
13. S. Y. Tong, G. E. Laramore, T. N. Rhodin, Phys. Rev. B 8, 5361 (1973).https://doi.org/PLRBAQ
14. J. B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 856 (1971).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
15. S. Y. Tong, Solid State Comm. 16, 91 (1975).https://doi.org/SSCOA4
16. M. B. Webb, M. G. Lagally, Solid State Phys. 28, 301 (1973).https://doi.org/SSPHAE
17. U. Landman, D. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 585 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
18. M. G. Lagally, J. C. Buchholz, G. C. Wang, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 12, 213 (1975).https://doi.org/JVSTAL
19. M. Van Hove, S. Y. Tong, N. Stoner, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 388 (1975).https://doi.org/BAPSA6

More about the Authors

Thor N. Rhodin. Professor of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University.

David S. Y. Tong. Assistant Professor of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.