Superconducting quantum interference devices are so sensitive to magnetic flux that they can map the tiny magnetic fields emanating from the human brain and detect the submicroscopic motions of gravity‐wave detectors.
▸ A lonely instrument in Baja California records tiny fluctuations in the Earth’s magnetic field, giving valuable information on the location of geothermal energy.
▸ An extremely quiet amplifier detects electrical noise generated by the fluctuating spins in a collection of chlorine nuclei—the first observation of nuclear‐spin noise.
▸ Superconducting gradiometers in liquid helium measure tiny fluctuating magnetic fields emanating from the human brain (see figure 1), pinpointing the source of the electrical discharge associated with focal epilepsy.
▸ An aluminum bar weighing 4800 kg and cooled to 4.2 K rests in a vacuum chamber at Stanford University, working as the world’s most sensitive monitor of gravitational radiation.
References
1. For a review of geophysical applications, see J. Clarke, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG‐19, 288 (1983).https://doi.org/IEMGAQ
2. T. Sleator, E. L. Hahn, C. Hilbert, J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1742 (1985)https://doi.org/PRLTAO
3. D. S. Barth, W. Sutherling, J. EngelJr., J. Beatty, Science 223, 293 (1984).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
4. M. Bassan, W. M. Fairbank, E. Mapoles, M. S. McAshan, P. F. Michelson, B. Moskowitz, K. Ralls, R. C. Taber, in Proc. 3rd Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, H. Ning, ed., North Holland, New York (1983), p. 667.
5. J. E. Zimmerman, P. Thiene, J. T. Harding, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1572 (1970).https://doi.org/JAPIAU
6. See, for example, M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, McGraw‐Hill, New York (1975).
7. For a detailed description of SQUIDS and copious references, see: J. Clarke, in Superconductor Applications: SQUIDS and Machines, B. B. Schwartz, S. Foner, eds., Plenum, New York (1977) p. 67; J. Clarke, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED‐27, 1896 (1980); https://doi.org/IETDAI J. Clarke, in Advances in Superconductivity, B. Deaver, J. Ruvalds, eds., Plenum, New York (1983) p. 13.
8. For collections of papers on SQUIDS, see the proceedings of the applied‐superconductivity conferences. The last three proceedings are in IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG‐17, no. 1 (1981); https://doi.org/IEMGAQ MAG‐19, no. 3 (1983); https://doi.org/IEMGAQ, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG‐21, no. 2 (1985). https://doi.org/IEMGAQ, IEEE Trans. Magn. Also see the Proc. Int. Conf. on Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices and Their Applications, H. D. Hahlbohm, H. Lübbig, eds., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1977), (1980), (1985).
9. J. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, A. H. Silver, J. E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 159 (1964).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
11. C. T. Rogers, R. A. Buhrman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1272 (1984); https://doi.org/PRLTAO R. H. Koch, in Noise in Physical Systems, M. Savelli, G. Leroy, J. P. Nougier, eds., North Holland, New York (1983) p. 377.
12. C. D. Tesche, K. H. Brown, A. C. Callegari, M. M. Chen, J. H. Greiner, H. C. Jones, M. B. Ketchen, K. K. Kim, A. W. Kleinsasser, H. A. Notarys, G. Proto, R. H. Wang, T. Yogi, Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Low Temperature Physics, U. Eckern, A. Schmid, W. Weber, H. Wuhl, eds., North Holland, New York (1984), p. 263.
13. G. J. van Nieuwenhuyzen, V. J. de Waal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 439 (1985).https://doi.org/APPLAB
14. J. E. Zimmerman, in Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices and Their Applications, H. D. Hahlbohm, H. Lübbig, eds., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1980), p. 423; W. A. Little, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55, 661 (1984).https://doi.org/RSINAK
15. For extensive reviews, see S. J. Williamson, L. Kaufman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 22, 129 (1981); https://doi.org/JMMMDC S. J. Williamson, G. L. Romani, L. Kaufman, I. Modena, eds., Biomagnetism: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Plenum, New York (1983).
16. For an elementary review on gravity waves, see S. L. Shapiro, R. F. Stark, S. J. Teukolsky, Am. Sci. 73, 248 (1985).https://doi.org/AMSCAC
17. G. L. Romani, S. J. Williamson, L. Kaufman, Science 216, 1339 (1982).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.
September 01, 2025 12:00 AM
Get PT in your inbox
Physics Today - The Week in Physics
The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.