Discover
/
Article

Reviving the Spirit of Enterprise: Role of the Federal Labs

JAN 01, 1986
Since a 1983 report of the White House Science Council recommended strengthening the role of Federal laboratories in America’s R&D, progress in transferring technology has ranged from impressive to modest. Congress is accelerating the action.
Paul A. Blanchard
Frank B. McDonald

About 400 research facilities officially classified as Federal laboratories employ nearly 185 000 of the nation’s scientists and engineers and account for roughly $18 billion per year—a third of all Federal R&D funding in fiscal 1985. Most of this support went to a relatively few large centers devoted to energy and weapons research, highenergy physics experiments, medical programs and space science and exploration. Besides the multipurpose national labs such as Sandia, Argonne, Los Alamos and the National Bureau of Standards, which perform a broad range of R&D activities, the full roster includes a diversity of installations, including the Boll Weevil Research Laboratory; the National Radio Astronomy Observatory; the Insect Attractant, Behavior and Basic Biology Center; the FBI Laboratory; and even the National Zoo. Despite the contributions of the Federal labs, how they can enrich the nation’s R&D enterprise with “public technology” has been a subject of concern in Washington for decades.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. M. Wyckoff, ed. Federal Laboratory Directory, 1982, National Bureau of Standards (January 1983).
    See also H. Mark and A. Levine, The Management of Research Institutions, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1984) for an excellent account of the history and operation of the Federal laboratory system.

  2. 2. Report of the White House Science Council, Federal Laboratory Review Panel, Office of Science and Technology Policy (May 1983). For an overview, see PHYSICS TODAY, September 1983, p. 39.

  3. 3. Progress Report on Implementing the Recommendations of the White House Science Council’s Federal Laboratory Review Panel, vols. I and II, Office of Science and Technology Policy (July 1984).

  4. 4. See PHYSICS TODAY, December 1985, p. 20.

  5. 5. Report to the President on Government Contracting for Research and Development, Bureau of the Budget for Committee on Government Operations, US Senate (17 May 1962).

  6. 6. Final Report of the Multiprogram Laboratory Panel, vols. I–III, Energy Research Advisory Board, Department of Energy (September 1982).
    For an overview, see PHYSICS TODAY, January 1983, p. 59.

  7. 7. The President’s Commission on Industrial Competitiveness, Global Competition: The New Reality, Government Printing Office (January 1985).

  8. 8. Revitalizing Federal Management: Managers and their ‘Overburdened Systems,’ National Academy of Public Administration (November 1983).

More about the Authors

Paul A. Blanchard. OSTP.

Frank B. McDonald. Chief Scientist of NASA.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1986_01.jpeg

Volume 39, Number 1

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.