Discover
/
Article

Retarded, or Casimir, Long‐Range Potentials

NOV 01, 1986
Even if two systems consist entirely of slowly moving constituents, nonrelativistic theory may not be adequate to determine the interaction energy of the systems when they are very far apart.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881043

Larry Spruch

Only someone with a short‐range view could fail to be aware of the great importance of long‐range interactions. Indeed, from the late 18th century, when Coulomb discovered that the electrostatic interaction has the same 1/r2 force law that Newton had found for the gravitational interaction, until perhaps the 1930s, when the strong and weak interactions began to be understood, long‐range interactions largely were the subject of physics. By long‐range interactions I mean not only those for which the potential behaves as 1/r for all r but those whose potentials behave asymptotically as some power of 1/r. These originate in 1/r potentials and include, for example, the van der Waals 1/r6 interaction (as calculated nonrelativistically) between two spherically symmetric atoms at a large separation r, and multipole interactions between charge distributions. Long‐range potentials therefore not only play a vital role in astrophysics via Newton’s law of gravitation and a significant role in nuclear physics via Coulomb’s law, but determine almost all of atomic, molecular and condensed‐matter physics.

References

  1. 1. L. Spruch, E. J. Kelsey, Phys. Rev. A 18, 845 (1978). https://doi.org/PLRAAN
    See also the reference therein by T. Boyer.

  2. 2. M. Born, M. Goeppert‐Mayer, in Handbuch der Physik, vol. 24/2, S. Flügge, ed., Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1933), p. 623.

  3. 3. J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 59, 928 (1941) (abstract).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. The original calculations of the different potentials are in H. B. G. Casimir, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 60, 793 (1948) (wall‐wall);
    H. B. G. Casimir, D. Polder, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948) (atom‐atom); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    H. B. G. Casimir, J. Chim. Phys. 46, 407 (1949) (atom‐wall); https://doi.org/JCPBAN
    E. Salpeter, Phys. Rev. 87, 328 (1952); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    T. Fulton, P. Martin, Phys. Rev. 95, 811 (1954) (electron‐electron); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    G. Barton, J. Phys. A 10, 601 (1977); https://doi.org/JPHAC5
    L. Spruch, E. J. Kelsey, Phys. Rev. A 18, 845 (1978) (electron‐wall); https://doi.org/PLRAAN
    J. Bernabeu, R. Tarrach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 102, 323 (1976) (electron‐atom); https://doi.org/APNYA6
    and reference 5 (electron‐ion).

  5. 5. E. J. Kelsey, L. Spruch, Phys. Rev. A 18, 15 (1978); https://doi.org/PLRAAN
    E. J. Kelsey, L. Spruch, Phys. Rev. A 18, 1055 (1978).https://doi.org/PLRAAN

  6. 6. E. A. Power, Introductory Quantum Electrodynamics, Elsevier, New York (1965),
    contains some excellent material on retarded potentials. For historical background, see S. J. Brush, Statistical Physics of Atomic Theory of Matter, from Boyle and Newton to Landau and Onsager, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N.J. (1983), p. 215.

  7. 7. H. B. G. Casimir, Haphazard Reality, Harper and Row, New York (1983).

  8. 8. G. Feinberg, J. Sucher, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 3333 (1968).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  9. 9. B. Chu, Molecular Forces: Based on the Baker Lectures of P. W. Debye, Interscience, New York (1967);
    section 5.2 contains a list of references.

  10. 10. R. Shakeshaft, L. Spruch, Phys. Rev. A 22, 811 (1980).https://doi.org/PLRAAN

  11. 11. S. L. Palfrey, S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1141 (1984).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. C. K. Au, G. Feinberg, J. Sucher, Phys. Rev., to be published November 1986.
    See also R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1253 (1985).https://doi.org/PLRAAN

  13. 13. H. B. G. Casimir, Physica (Utrecht) 19, 846 (1959).https://doi.org/PHYSAG

  14. 14. T. H. Boyer, Phys. Rev. 174, 1764 (1968). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    See also K. A. Milton, L. L. DeRaad, J. Schwinger, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 115, 388 (1978).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  15. 15. K. A. Milton, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1441 (1980); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    K. A. Milton, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1444 (1980); and references therein.https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

More about the Authors

Larry Spruch. New York University, New York, New York.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1986_11.jpeg

Volume 39, Number 11

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.