Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy

JAN 01, 1996

With a means of measuring a sample’s natural resonance frequencies and a desktop computer, one can use resonant ultrasound spectroscopy to determine the elastic constants of a broad range of crystalline and noncrystalline materials.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881483

Julian Maynard

When a new crystalline material is discovered, one of the first fundamental properties to be determined is the atomic structure, defined by the minimum in the free energy with respect to the positions of the atoms. Another fundamental characteristic of interest is the curvature of the free energy in the vicinity of the minimum, and this would be manifest in the elastic constants for the material. As derivatives of the free energy, elastic constants are closely connected to thermodynamic properties of the material. They can be related to the specific heat, the Debye temperature and the Gruneisen parameter (which relates the thermal expansion coefficient to the specific heat at constant volume), and they can be used to check theoretical models. Extensive quantitative connections among thermodynamic properties can be made if the elastic constants are known as functions of temperature and pressure. The damping of elastic waves provides information on anharmonicity and on coupling with electrons and other relaxation mechanisms. The elastic properties are perhaps most valuable as probes of phase transitions, such as superconductivity transitions. Clearly precise and accurate measurements of elastic constants furnish significant information about materials.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. A. E. H. Love, Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Cambridge U.P. Cambridge, UK (1927).
2. J. M. Ide, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 6, 296 (1935).https://doi.org/RSINAK
3. D. B. Fraser, R. C. LeCraw, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 35, 1113 (1964).https://doi.org/RSINAK
4. H. Ekstein, T. Schiffman, J. Appl. Phys. 27, 405 (1956).https://doi.org/JAPIAU
5. H. H. DemarestJr, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 768 (1971).https://doi.org/JASMAN
6. E. Schreiber, O. L. Anderson, N. Soga, N. Warren, C. Sholtz, Science 167, 732 (1970). https://doi.org/SCIEAS
E. Schreiber, O. L. Anderson, Science 168, 1579 (1970).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
7. I. Ohno, J. Phys. Earth 24, 355 (1976).https://doi.org/JPHEAF
8. A. Migliori et al., Phys. Rev. B 41, 2098 (1990).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
9. W. M. Visscher, A. Migliori, T. M. Bell, R. A. Reinert, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 2154 (1991).https://doi.org/JASMAN
10. J. D. Maynard, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1754 (1992).https://doi.org/JASMAN
11. A. Migliori, J. L. Sarrao, W. M. Visscher, T. M. Bell, Ming Lei, Z. Fisk, R. G. Leisure, Physica B 183, 1 (1993).https://doi.org/PHYBE3
12. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, UK (1986).
13. T. Goto, O. L. Anderson, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 1405 (1988).https://doi.org/RSINAK
14. V.‐T. Kuokkala, R. B. Schwarz, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 3136 (1992).https://doi.org/RSINAK
15. A. Migliori, W. M. Visscher, S. Wong, S. E. Brown, I. Tanaka, H. Kojima, P. B. Allen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2458 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. F. Willis, R. G. Leisure, I. Jacob, Phys. Rev. B 50, 13792 (1994).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
17. P. S. Spoor, J. D. Maynard, A. R. Kortan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3462 (1995).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the Authors

Julian Maynard. Pennsylvania State, University.