Discover
/
Article

Relativistic cosmology

NOV 01, 1967
Questions asked by cosmologists today concern the large‐scale structure of the universe. How do intergalactic distances expand? Is the universe isotropic and homogeneous? Flat or curved? Finite or infinite? Did it all start with a “big bang?”

DOI: 10.1063/1.3034019

Wolfgang Rindler

SOME OF THE MOST exciting recent developments in physics have been in the realms of the very small and the very large. Chief among the latter was the discovery of “quasars,” which has quadrupled our depth penetration of the universe (if quasars are where most astronomers think they are), and which has also stimulated the possibly irrelevant but intrinsically fruitful investigations into gravitational collapse. Then came the discovery of the 3°K background radiation, which seems to have taken us back a long way in time to an apparent “big‐bang” origin of the universe. Both bode ill for the steady‐state theory to which many of us had been attracted. Most recently, Robert H. Dicke’s speculations and observations on the oblate sun have battered at the edifice of general relativity, and thus at the very foundations of modern cosmology. Even advances in the realm of the very small affect our knowledge of the very large; for, after all, most of the phenomena we see in the sky are manifestations of either gravitational or nuclear activity.

References

  1. 1. H.‐Y. Chiu, PHYSICS TODAY 17, no. 5, 21 (1964); https://doi.org/PHTOAD
    H. J. Smith, Appl. Optics 5, 1701 (1966); https://doi.org/APOPAI
    E. M. Burbidge, p. 399 in Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 5, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, Calif. (1967).

  2. 2. R. H. Dicke, P. J. E. Peebles, P. G. Roll, D. T. Wilkinson, Astrophys. J. 142, 414 (1965); https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    A. A. Penzias, R. W. Wilson, Astrophys. J. 142, 419 (1965).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  3. 3. R. H. Dicke, PHYSICS TODAY 20, no. 1, 55 (1967); https://doi.org/PHTOAD
    I. W. Roxburgh, Nature 213, 1077 (1967).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  4. 4. H. Bondi, Cosmology, Cambridge U. Press, London (1961), p. 19.

  5. 5. F. Hoyle, 1963 Moscow lecture, unpublished.

  6. 6. R. B. Partridge, D. T. Wilkinson, paper at Jan. 1967 APS Annual Meeting, New York;
    R. K. Sachs, A. M. Wolfe, Astrophys. J. 147, 73 (1967).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  7. 7. G. de Vaucouleurs, Soviet Astron.‐AJ 3, 897 (1960).

  8. 8. A. G. Walker, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 19, 219, 227 (1944).https://doi.org/JLMSAK

  9. 9. W. Rindler, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 116, 662 (1956).https://doi.org/MNRAA4

  10. 10. B. M. Tinsley, PhD thesis, University of Texas (1967).

  11. 11. E. L. Scott, Astron. J. 62, 248 (1957).https://doi.org/ANJOAA

  12. 12. H. P. Robertson, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 67, 82 (1955).

  13. 13. P. W. Hodge, G. Wallerstein, Pub. Astr. Soc. Pac. 78, 411 (1966); https://doi.org/PASPAU
    O. C. Wilson, Pub. Astr. Soc. Pac. 79, 46 (1967); https://doi.org/PASPAU
    P. A. Wayman, ibid. 156.

  14. 14. D. W. Sciama, M. N. Roy, Astr. Soc. 128, 49 (1964);
    D. W. Sciama, W. C. Saslaw, Nature 210, 348 (1966); https://doi.org/NATUAS
    P. Veron, Nature 211, 724 (1966).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  15. 15. M. Kaufman, Nature 207, 736 (1965); https://doi.org/NATUAS
    P. J. E. Peebles, R. H. Dicke, Nature 211, 574 (1966).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  16. 16. D. W. Sciama, M. J. Rees, Nature 211, 1283 (1966); https://doi.org/NATUAS
    P. Kafka, Nature 213, 346 (1967).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  17. 17. G. R. Burbidge, E. M. Burbidge, Astrophys. J. 148, L107 (1967).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  18. 18. W. H. McCrea, E. A. Milne, Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 5, 73 (1934);
    O. Heckmann, E. Schücking, p. 489 in Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 53, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1959).

  19. 19. W. H. McCrea, Proc. Roy. Soc. A206, 562 (1951).

  20. 20. E. L. Schücking, AMS Summer Seminar at Cornell (1965).

  21. 21. H. P. Robertson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 5, 62 (1933).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  22. 22. R. Stabell, S. Refsdal, M. N. Roy, Astr. Soc. 132, 379 (1966).

  23. 23. A. Sandage, paper at 1967 (January) Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics in New York.

  24. 24. G. O. Abell, p. 1 in Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 3, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, Calif. (1965);
    P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J. 147, 859 (1967).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  25. 25. A. Sandage, Astrophys. J. 133, 355 (1961).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  26. 26. S. Refsdal, M. N. Roy, Astr. Soc. 128, 295, 307 (1964);
    S. Refsdal, M. N. Roy, 132, 101 (1966);
    S. Refsdal, M. N. Roy, 134, 315 (1966).

  27. 27. J. Kristian, R. K. Sachs, Astrophys. J. 143, 379 (1966).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  28. 28. W. H. McCrea, p. 321 in Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 16, The Institute of Physics and the Physical Society, London (1953).

  29. 29. D. W. Sciama, p. 311 in Vistas in Astronomy, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1960).

  30. 30. Ya. B. Zeldovich, p. 241 in Advances in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York (1965).

  31. 31. J. R. Glanfield, M. N. Roy, Astr. Soc. 131, 271 (1966).

  32. 32. I. D. Novikov, Ya. B. Zeldovich, op. cit. ref. 1 (Ann. Rev.), p. 627.

More about the Authors

Wolfgang Rindler. Southwest Center for Advanced Studies, Dallas, Texas.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1967_11.jpeg

Volume 20, Number 11

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.