Discover
/
Article

Reflections on Early Work on ‘Big Bang’ Cosmology

AUG 01, 1988
The standard model of the universe’s development—the hot Big Bang—is successful in accounting for the fossil cosmic background radiation and the high, uniform cosmic abundance of helium.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881126

Ralph A. Alpher
Robert Herman

Primordial nucleosynthesis of the lightest elements in the early universe and stellar nucleosynthesis of the heavier elements are by now both reasonably well understood. The classic paper on stellar nucleosynthesis of elements heavier than helium was published in 1957 by Margaret Burbidge, Geoffrey Burbidge, William Fowler and Fred Hoyle, and that on light‐element primordial nucleosynthesis in 1967 by Robert V. Wagoner, Fowler and Hoyle. The physical conditions required for primordial element‐building also provide useful insights into—and constraints on—the allowable number, type and degeneracy of neutrinos, the number and properties of weakly interacting particles, the mean density of luminous matter, and the entropy per baryon, or photon‐to‐baryon ratio. For many years that ratio was the one “free” parameter in the canonical Big Bang model, although we, with George Gamow, and others had long since suggested that it should not be considered free, but should be explained as a natural consequence of the physics of the very early universe.

References

  1. 1. E. M. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler, F. Hoyle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 547 (1957). https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    R. V. Wagoner, W. A. Fowler, F. Hoyle, Astrophys. J. 148, 3 (1967).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  2. 2. R. Alpher, G. Gamow, R. Herman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 58, 2179 (1967).https://doi.org/PNASA6

  3. 3. G. Gamow, Creation of the Universe, Viking, New York (1952).
    P. J. E. Peebles, Physical Cosmology, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N.J. (1971).
    F. Reines, ed., Cosmology, Fusion and Other Matters: George Gamow Memorial Volume, Colorado Assoc. U.P., Boulder (1972).
    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, Wiley, New York (1972).
    S. Weinberg, The First Three Minutes, Basic Books, New York (1977; second edition, 1988).
    E. R. Harrison, Cosmology, Cambridge U.P., New York (1981).
    J. Bernstein, G. Feinberg, eds., Cosmological Constants: Papers in Modern Cosmology, Columbia U.P., New York (1986).

  4. 4. A. A. Penzias, R. W. Wilson, Astrophys. J. 142, 419 (1965). https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    R. H. Dicke, P. J. E. Peebles, P. G. Roll, D. T. Wilkinson, Astrophys. J. 142, 414 (1965).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  5. 5. R. Alpher, Phys. Rev. 74, 1577 (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  6. 6. F. Hoyle, The Nature of the Universe, Harper, New York (1950).

  7. 7. R. Alpher, R. Herman, Nature 162, 774 (1948).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  8. 8. R. Alpher, R. Herman, G. Gamow, Phys. Rev. 74, 1198 (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  9. 9. R. Alpher, R. Herman, Phys. Rev. 74, 1737 (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  10. 10. R. Alpher, R. Herman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 22, 153 (1950).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  11. 11. G. Gamow, Ohio J. Sci. 35, 406 (1935).https://doi.org/OJSCA9

  12. 12. G. Gamow, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 32, 353 (1942).https://doi.org/JWASA3

  13. 13. G. Gamow, Phys. Rev. 70, 572 (1946).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  14. 14. R. Alpher, H. A. Bethe, G. Gamow, Phys. Rev. 73, 803 (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  15. 15. G. Gamow, Phys. Rev. 74, 505 (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  16. 16. G. Gamow, Nature 162, 680 (1948).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  17. 17. D. T. Wilkinson, P. J. E. Peebles, in Serendipitous Discoveries in Radio Astronomy, K. Kellermann, B. Sheets, eds., Natl. Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green Bank, W. Va. (1983).

  18. 18. H. A. Bethe, Elementary Nuclear Theory, Wiley, New York (1947).

  19. 19. R. Alpher, R. Herman, Phys. Rev. 75, 1089 (1949); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    R. Alpher, R. Herman, 84, 60 (1951).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.

  20. 20. R. Alpher, R. Herman, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 119, 325 (1975).https://doi.org/PAPCAA

  21. 21. F. Hoyle, R. J. Tayler, Nature 203, 1108 (1964).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  22. 22. J. S. Smart, Phys. Rev. 74, 1882 (1948); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. S. Smart, 75, 1379 (1949).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.

  23. 23. J. H. Applegate, C. J. Hogan, R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1151 (1987).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  24. 24. C. Hayashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Japan) 5, 224 (1950).

  25. 25. R. Alpher, J. W. Follin, R. Herman, Phys. Rev. 92, 1347 (1953).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  26. 26. R. Alpher, J. W. Follin, R. Herman, Phys. Rev. A 91, 479 (1953).
    J. W. Follin, R. Alpher, R. Herman, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. Ser. II 4, 476 (1959);
    J. W. Follin, R. Alpher, R. Herman, 5, 287 (1960).

  27. 27. R. Alpher, R. Herman, Science 128, 904 (1958).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  28. 28. R. A. Matzner, Astrophys. J. 154, 1123 (1968).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  29. 29. L. A. Rawley, J. H. Taylor, M. M. Davis, D. W. Allan, Science 238, 761 (1987).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  30. 30. J. R. Gott, J. E. Gunn, D. N. Schramm, B. M. Tinsley, Astrophys. J. 194, 543 (1974).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  31. 31. R. V. Wagoner, Astrophys. J. 179, 343 (1973).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  32. 32. G. Gamow, Mat.‐Fys. Medd. 27 (10), 1 (1953);
    G. Gamow, Vistas Astron. 2, 1726 (1956).https://doi.org/VASTA6

  33. 33. A. G. Doroshkevich, I. D. Novikov, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 9, 111 (1964).https://doi.org/SPHDA9

  34. 34. G. Gamow, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 367 (1949).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  35. 35. W. S. Adams, Astrophys. J. 93, 11 (1941). https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    A. McKellar, Pub. Dom. Astrophys. Obs. Victoria B. C. Can. 7, 251 (1941).

More about the Authors

Ralph A. Alpher. Union College.

Robert Herman. University of Texas, Austin.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1988_08.jpeg

Volume 41, Number 8

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.