Discover
/
Article

Recent advances in neutron physics

FEB 01, 1977
Along with new techniques, the last decade has seen new studies—such as ultracold neutrons and “neutron bottles,” resonance behavior and doorway states, subthreshold fission, doubly radiative capture and neutron stars.
Herman Feshbach
Eric Sheldon

“At twilight on the sixth day of Creation, so say the Hebrew commentators to the Old Testament, God made for man a number of tools that give him also the gift of creation. If the commentators were alive today, they would write God made the neutron.” In these dramatic words the late mathematician and science historian Jacob Bronowski conveyed the importance of the neutron to modern man. Indeed, nuclear physics as we know it may be said to owe its origins to the 1932 discovery of the neutron. We are coming increasingly to appreciate the enormous significance and variety that neutron physics displays throughout the entire realm of the physical sciences and beyond, into such developing areas as therapy, bioanalysis, materials research and astronomy. To survey in any comprehensive fashion the advances achieved over the past decade alone would carry us far beyond the scope of an article such as this. We therefore will touch only upon some of the salient features on which fresh light is being shed and discuss some of the fields in which neutron physics is being called upon to play a prominent part.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. Bronowski, The Ascent of Man, Little, Brown, Waltham, Mass. (1974), page 341.

  2. 2. Proceedings of The International Conference on the Interactions of Neutrons with Nuclei (E. Sheldon, ed.), Technical Information Center, ERDA, Oak Ridge (1976), volumes I and II, CONF‐760715‐P1 and P2.

  3. 3. G. H. R. Kegel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 135, 53 (1976); https://doi.org/NUIMAL
    see also contributed Paper PB2/H7 on page 1373 of ref. 2.

  4. 4. W. Bertozzi, F. R. Paolini, C. P. Sargent, Phys. Rev. 110, 790 (L) (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  5. 5. L. Jarczyk, H. Knoepfel, J. Lang, R. Müller, W. Wölfli, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 13, 287 (1961).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  6. 6. Nuclear Cross Sections and Technology: Proceedings of a Conference, volumes I and II (R. A. Schrack, C. D. Bowman, eds.), NBS Special Publication 425, Washington, D.C. (1975).

  7. 7. Nuclear Structure Study with Neutrons (J. Erö, J. Szücs, eds.), Plenum, New York (1974).

  8. 8. T. Tamura, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 679 (1965); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    T. Tamura, Phys. Reports 14C, 61 (1974).

  9. 9. R. Shamu, G. Haouat, J. Lachkar, Ch. Lagrange, M. McEllistrem, Y. Patin, J. Sigaud, F. Coçu, E. Bernstein. J. Raminez, in Proceedings of the National Soviet Conference on Neutron Physics, Kiev, 9–13 June 1975, Obninsk (1976);
    J. P. Delaroche, Ch. Lagrange, J. Salvy, in Proceedings of the Conference on The Use of Nuclear Theory in Neutron Data Evaluation (8–12 Dec. 1975) International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste.

  10. 10. L. G. Sanin, W. A. Schier, B. K. Barnes, G. P. Couchell, J. J. Egan, P. Harihar, A. Mittler, E. Sheldon, Nucl. Phys. A 245, 317 (1975); https://doi.org/NUPABL
    L. G. Sanin, W. A. Schier, B. K. Barnes, G. P. Couchell, J. J. Egan, P. Harihar, A. Mittler, E. Sheldon, 254, 80 (1975); https://doi.org/NUPABL , Nucl. Phys. A
    L. G. Sanin, W. A. Schier, B. K. Barnes, G. P. Couchell, J. J. Egan, P. Harihar, A. Mittler, E. Sheldon, 266, 16 (1976).https://doi.org/NUPABL , Nucl. Phys. A

  11. 11. H. Feshbach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 1 (1974), https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    and in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Physics, Munich. 27 Aug.–1 Sept. 1973, (J. de Boer, H. J. Mang, eds.), North‐Holland, New York (1973).

  12. 12. S. M. Grimes, J. D. Anderson, J. C. Davis, C. Wong, Phys. Rev. C 8, 1770 (1973).https://doi.org/PRVCAN

  13. 13. R. L. Feinstein, M.I.T. Thesis (1975).

  14. 14. B. Block, H. Feshbach, Ann. Physics (N.Y.) 23, 47 (1963).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  15. 15. Statistical Properties of Nuclei (J. B. Garg, ed.), Plenum, New York (1972).

More about the authors

Herman Feshbach, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Eric Sheldon, University of Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1977_02.jpeg

Volume 30, Number 2

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.