Discover
/
Article

Recent advances in neutron physics

FEB 01, 1977
Along with new techniques, the last decade has seen new studies—such as ultracold neutrons and “neutron bottles,” resonance behavior and doorway states, subthreshold fission, doubly radiative capture and neutron stars.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3037411

Herman Feshbach
Eric Sheldon

“At twilight on the sixth day of Creation, so say the Hebrew commentators to the Old Testament, God made for man a number of tools that give him also the gift of creation. If the commentators were alive today, they would write God made the neutron.” In these dramatic words the late mathematician and science historian Jacob Bronowski conveyed the importance of the neutron to modern man. Indeed, nuclear physics as we know it may be said to owe its origins to the 1932 discovery of the neutron. We are coming increasingly to appreciate the enormous significance and variety that neutron physics displays throughout the entire realm of the physical sciences and beyond, into such developing areas as therapy, bioanalysis, materials research and astronomy. To survey in any comprehensive fashion the advances achieved over the past decade alone would carry us far beyond the scope of an article such as this. We therefore will touch only upon some of the salient features on which fresh light is being shed and discuss some of the fields in which neutron physics is being called upon to play a prominent part.

References

  1. 1. J. Bronowski, The Ascent of Man, Little, Brown, Waltham, Mass. (1974), page 341.

  2. 2. Proceedings of The International Conference on the Interactions of Neutrons with Nuclei (E. Sheldon, ed.), Technical Information Center, ERDA, Oak Ridge (1976), volumes I and II, CONF‐760715‐P1 and P2.

  3. 3. G. H. R. Kegel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 135, 53 (1976); https://doi.org/NUIMAL
    see also contributed Paper PB2/H7 on page 1373 of ref. 2.

  4. 4. W. Bertozzi, F. R. Paolini, C. P. Sargent, Phys. Rev. 110, 790 (L) (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  5. 5. L. Jarczyk, H. Knoepfel, J. Lang, R. Müller, W. Wölfli, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 13, 287 (1961).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  6. 6. Nuclear Cross Sections and Technology: Proceedings of a Conference, volumes I and II (R. A. Schrack, C. D. Bowman, eds.), NBS Special Publication 425, Washington, D.C. (1975).

  7. 7. Nuclear Structure Study with Neutrons (J. Erö, J. Szücs, eds.), Plenum, New York (1974).

  8. 8. T. Tamura, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 679 (1965); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    T. Tamura, Phys. Reports 14C, 61 (1974).

  9. 9. R. Shamu, G. Haouat, J. Lachkar, Ch. Lagrange, M. McEllistrem, Y. Patin, J. Sigaud, F. Coçu, E. Bernstein. J. Raminez, in Proceedings of the National Soviet Conference on Neutron Physics, Kiev, 9–13 June 1975, Obninsk (1976);
    J. P. Delaroche, Ch. Lagrange, J. Salvy, in Proceedings of the Conference on The Use of Nuclear Theory in Neutron Data Evaluation (8–12 Dec. 1975) International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste.

  10. 10. L. G. Sanin, W. A. Schier, B. K. Barnes, G. P. Couchell, J. J. Egan, P. Harihar, A. Mittler, E. Sheldon, Nucl. Phys. A 245, 317 (1975); https://doi.org/NUPABL
    L. G. Sanin, W. A. Schier, B. K. Barnes, G. P. Couchell, J. J. Egan, P. Harihar, A. Mittler, E. Sheldon, 254, 80 (1975); https://doi.org/NUPABL , Nucl. Phys. A
    L. G. Sanin, W. A. Schier, B. K. Barnes, G. P. Couchell, J. J. Egan, P. Harihar, A. Mittler, E. Sheldon, 266, 16 (1976).https://doi.org/NUPABL , Nucl. Phys. A

  11. 11. H. Feshbach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 1 (1974), https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    and in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Physics, Munich. 27 Aug.–1 Sept. 1973, (J. de Boer, H. J. Mang, eds.), North‐Holland, New York (1973).

  12. 12. S. M. Grimes, J. D. Anderson, J. C. Davis, C. Wong, Phys. Rev. C 8, 1770 (1973).https://doi.org/PRVCAN

  13. 13. R. L. Feinstein, M.I.T. Thesis (1975).

  14. 14. B. Block, H. Feshbach, Ann. Physics (N.Y.) 23, 47 (1963).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  15. 15. Statistical Properties of Nuclei (J. B. Garg, ed.), Plenum, New York (1972).

More about the Authors

Herman Feshbach. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Eric Sheldon. University of Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1977_02.jpeg

Volume 30, Number 2

Related content
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.
/
Article
Positron emission tomography’s ability to image the body’s biochemistry, not just its anatomy, makes it a powerful tool for detecting diseases.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.