This new class of ultraviolet lasers, very efficient and apparently scalable to high power, promises to be of value in such applications as photochemical separation.
The rare‐gas monohalides are simple diatomic molecules whose properties and emission spectra were essentially unknown as recently as four years ago. Now they are the active media for gas lasers that could provide overall electrical efficiency as high as 10%. These lasers operate in the ultraviolet and vacuum‐ultraviolet spectral regions and are the first lasers outside the infrared region that appear to be scalable to high single‐pulse energy (greater that 100 joules per pulse) with high average power and efficiency. Not surprisingly in light of the species’ novelty and the laser’s promised utility (for example, in photochemical‐separation schemes), research and development in this area has grown remarkably since the first laser demonstration three years ago.
This article is only available in PDF format
References
1. J. J. Ewing, C. A. Brau, “High Efficiency UV Lasers” in Tunable Lasers and Applications (A. Mooradian, T. Jaeger, P. Stokseth, eds.) Springer, Berlin (1976), page 21. (This article as well as reference 2 contain extensive lists of references.)
2. C. A. Brau, in Excimer Lasers (C. K. Rhodes, ed.), Springer, Berlin, to be published.
3. C. K. Rhodes, J. Quant. Elec. QE10, 153 (1974).
7. M. Rokni, J. H. Jacob, J. A. Mangano, Phys. Rev. A 16, 2216 (1977).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
8. J. E. Velazco, J. H. Kolts, D. W. Setser, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 3468 (1976).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
9. K. J. Laidler, Theories of Chemical Reaction Rates, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY (1969); J. L. Magee, J. Chem. Phys. 8, 687 (1940); https://doi.org/JCPSA6 M. Polanyi, Atomic Reactions, Williams and Northgate, London (1932).
10. D. C. Lorents, R. M. Hill, D. L. Huestis, M. V. McCusker, H. H. Nakano, in Electronic Transition Lasers II (L. E. Wilson, S. N. Suchard, J. I. Steinfeld, eds.), MIT, Cambridge, Mass (1977), page 30.
12. J. D. Daugherty, in Laser Plasmas (G. Bekefi, ed.), Wiley, New York (1976), page 369.
13. J. D. Daugherty, J. A. Mangano, J. H. Jacob, Appl. Phys. Lett. 28, 581 (1976).https://doi.org/APPLAB
14. J. K. Rice, A. K. Hays, J. R. Woodworth, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 31 (1977).https://doi.org/APPLAB
15. E. J. Schimitschek, J. E. Celto, J. A. Trias, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 608 (1977); https://doi.org/APPLAB J. H. Parks, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 192 (1977); https://doi.org/APPLAB J. H. Parks, 31, 297 (1977); https://doi.org/APPLAB, Appl. Phys. Lett. K. Y. Tang, R. O. Hunter, G. Oldenettel, C. Howton, D. Huestis, D. Eckstrom, B. Perry, M. McCusker, Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 226 (1978).https://doi.org/APPLAB
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
Detecting quantum particles of gravity was long considered hopeless. A new perspective, which takes advantage of quantum technologies, suggests that an experimental realization may be closer than previously thought.