Radiation Risk and Ethics

SEP 01, 1999

The established worldwide practice of protecting people from radiation costs hundreds of billions of dollars a year to implement and may well determine the world’s future energy system. But is it right?

DOI: 10.1063/1.882810

Zbigniew Jaworowski

The psychosomatic disorder observed in the 15 million people in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia who were affected by the April 1986 Chernobyl accident are probably the accident’s most important effect on public health. These disorders could not be attributed to the ionizing radiation, but were assumed to be linked to the popular belief that any amount of man‐made radiation—even minuscule, close to zero doses—can cause harm, an assumption that gained wide currency when it was accepted in the 1950s, arbitrarily, as the basis for regulations on radiation and nuclear safety.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. L. A. Ilyin, Chernobyl: Myth and Reality, Megapolis, Moscow (1995).
2. Chernobyl—Ten Years On, Radiological and Health Impact, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development, Paris (1996).
3. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR, New York (1993).
4. M. Sohrabi, in High Levels of Natural Radiation, J. U. A. M. Sohrabi, S. A. Durrani, eds., International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna, Austria (1990), p. 39.
5. P. C. Kesavan, in High Levels of Natural Radiation L. Wei, T. Sugahara, Z. Tao, eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996), p. 111.
6. P. A. Karam, S. A. Leslie, in Proc. 9th Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna, Austria (1996), p. 12.
7. H. Planel et al.Health Physics 52(5), 571 (1987).
8. D. Billen, BELLE Newsletter 3 (1), 8 (1984).
9. J. S, Hezir, statement at the US Environmental Protection Agency’s public hearing on the proposed recommendations for federal radiation protection guidance for exposure of the general public, held in Washington, DC, on 22‐23 February 1995.
10. H. Koning, International Herald Tribune, 27 November 1996, p. 9.
11. B. L. Cohen, Radiation Research 149, 525 (1998).
12. K. Sankaranarayanan, lecture presented at 46th session of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 18 June 1997.
13. L. S, Taylor, Proc. International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, Israel Health Physics Society, Jerusalem (1980), p. 307.
14. M. Goldman, R. J. Catlin, L. Anspaugh, US Department of Energy research report, DOE/RR‐0232 (1987).
15. K.‐L. Sjölom, G. Linsley, International Atomic Energy Authority Bulletin 40(4), 18 (1999).https://doi.org/IJERDN
16. G. F. Atkinson, Science 7, 7 (1898).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
17. S. Kondo, Health Effects of Low‐level Radiation, Kinki U. P., Osaka, Japan (1993).
18. B. L. Cohen, in Rational Readings on Environmental Concerns, J. H. Lehr, ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1992), p. 461.

More about the authors

Zbigniew Jaworowski, Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw.