Discover
/
Article

Radiation Risk and Ethics

SEP 01, 1999
The established worldwide practice of protecting people from radiation costs hundreds of billions of dollars a year to implement and may well determine the world’s future energy system. But is it right?

DOI: 10.1063/1.882810

Zbigniew Jaworowski

The psychosomatic disorder observed in the 15 million people in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia who were affected by the April 1986 Chernobyl accident are probably the accident’s most important effect on public health. These disorders could not be attributed to the ionizing radiation, but were assumed to be linked to the popular belief that any amount of man‐made radiation—even minuscule, close to zero doses—can cause harm, an assumption that gained wide currency when it was accepted in the 1950s, arbitrarily, as the basis for regulations on radiation and nuclear safety.

References

  1. 1. L. A. Ilyin, Chernobyl: Myth and Reality, Megapolis, Moscow (1995).

  2. 2. Chernobyl—Ten Years On, Radiological and Health Impact, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development, Paris (1996).

  3. 3. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR, New York (1993).

  4. 4. M. Sohrabi, in High Levels of Natural Radiation, J. U. A. M. Sohrabi, S. A. Durrani, eds., International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna, Austria (1990), p. 39.

  5. 5. P. C. Kesavan, in High Levels of Natural Radiation L. Wei, T. Sugahara, Z. Tao, eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996), p. 111.

  6. 6. P. A. Karam, S. A. Leslie, in Proc. 9th Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna, Austria (1996), p. 12.

  7. 7. H. Planel et al.Health Physics 52(5), 571 (1987).

  8. 8. D. Billen, BELLE Newsletter 3 (1), 8 (1984).

  9. 9. J. S, Hezir, statement at the US Environmental Protection Agency’s public hearing on the proposed recommendations for federal radiation protection guidance for exposure of the general public, held in Washington, DC, on 22‐23 February 1995.

  10. 10. H. Koning, International Herald Tribune, 27 November 1996, p. 9.

  11. 11. B. L. Cohen, Radiation Research 149, 525 (1998).

  12. 12. K. Sankaranarayanan, lecture presented at 46th session of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 18 June 1997.

  13. 13. L. S, Taylor, Proc. International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, Israel Health Physics Society, Jerusalem (1980), p. 307.

  14. 14. M. Goldman, R. J. Catlin, L. Anspaugh, US Department of Energy research report, DOE/RR‐0232 (1987).

  15. 15. K.‐L. Sjölom, G. Linsley, International Atomic Energy Authority Bulletin 40(4), 18 (1999).https://doi.org/IJERDN

  16. 16. G. F. Atkinson, Science 7, 7 (1898).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  17. 17. S. Kondo, Health Effects of Low‐level Radiation, Kinki U. P., Osaka, Japan (1993).

  18. 18. B. L. Cohen, in Rational Readings on Environmental Concerns, J. H. Lehr, ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1992), p. 461.

More about the Authors

Zbigniew Jaworowski. Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1999_09.jpeg

Volume 52, Number 9

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.