Discover
/
Article

Radiation hazards in realistic perspective

JUN 01, 1962
Radiation protection standards are based on a combination of (1) very limited technical evidence, (2) technical judgment, and (3) selective judgment with regard to matters that are primarily social, political, or economic. There is virtually no information on the deleterious effects of radiation on man at the low levels recommended for radiation workers or for the population in general. These levels represent only a small fraction of the background radiation to which man has always been subjected. Moreover, any disease that can be caused by radiation can occur naturally without there being any necessary distinction as to the origin. Questions such as these, together with a discussion relative to the radiation to which man is normally exposed, were discussed in a lecture given at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna on March 31, 1960, and the present paper is an abridgment of that lecture.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3058224

Lauriston S. Taylor

That radiation in its many forms is of great value to man is not debatable. Similarly, that radiation can be received by man in harmful amounts is not debatable. The question as to whether or not there is some level of radiation exposure below which impairment will not result to man is most decidedly debatable; and, despite the enormous effort that has been directed to this point, there is no essential knowledge today which was not available ten years ago and which will lead to a specific answer to this question. It is therefore assumed with great prudence, but without proof. that any unnecessary exposure of man to radiation must be considered as harmful. Again, the degree of harm is completely undefinable for the levels of radiation to which tens of thousands of radiation workers have been exposed for the past several decades; its deleterious effects on the human system are yet to be proven.

More about the Authors

Lauriston S. Taylor. National Bureau of Standards, National Committee on Radiation Protection and Measurements.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1962_06.jpeg

Volume 15, Number 6

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.