Quantum nature of superfluid helium

AUG 01, 1971

The macroscopic behavior that we describe as “superfluidity” is traceable to the microscopic, quantum‐mechanical properties of liquid helium.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3022882

Seth J. Putterman

Isadore Rudnick

Low‐temperature physics owes its existence to liquid helium, the refrigerant that permits investigation of phenomena occurring at a few degrees Kelvin. But liquid helium is fascinating in its own right, and the goal of understanding its “superfluidity” below 2.17 K has stimulated both experimenters and theorists.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. J. F. Allen, A. D. Misener, Nature 141, 75 (1938); https://doi.org/NATUAS
P. Kapitsa, Nature 141, 74 (1938).https://doi.org/NATUAS
2. W. H. Keesom, G. E. MacWood, Physica 5, 737 (1938).https://doi.org/PHYSAG
3. L. Tisza, Nature, 141, 913 (1938);
L. D. Landau, J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941);
L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon, London (1959), chapter 16.
4. F. London, Superfluids, vol. 2, Wiley, New York (1954), page 151, footnote.
5. L. Onsager, Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 6, 249;
R. P. Feynman in Progress in Low Temperature Physics vol. 1 (C. J. Goiter, ed.), North‐Holland, Amsterdam (1955) page 36.
6. W. F. Vinen, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A260, 218 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ
7. S. C. Whitmore, W. ZimmermannJr, Phys. Rev. 166, 181 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
8. G. W. Rayfield, F. Reif, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 305 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
9. G. B. Hess, Phys. Rev. 161, 189 (1967).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
10. Reference 4, page 151.
11. R. E. Packard, T. M. SandersJr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 823 (1969).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
12. G. B. Hess, W. M. Fairbank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 216 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
13. J. D. Reppy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 733 (1965); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
J. B. Mehl, W. ZimmermannJr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 815 (1965); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
J. B. Mehl, W. ZimmermannJr, Phys. Rev. 167, 214 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
14. U. Essman, H. Träuble, Scientific American, March 1971, page 75;
H. Trauble, U. Essman, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 4052 (1968).https://doi.org/JAPIAU
15. R. P. Henkel, E. N. Smith, J. Reppy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 1276 (1969).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. M. Kriss, I. Rudnick, J. Low Temp. Phys. 3, 339 (1970).https://doi.org/JLTPAC
17. I. Rudnick, J. C. Fraser, J. Low Temp. Phys. 3, 225 (1970).https://doi.org/JLTPAC
18. V. L. Ginzburg, L. P. Pitaevskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 34, 1240 (1958)
[V. L. Ginzburg, L. P. Pitaevskii, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 7, 858 (1958)].https://doi.org/ZETFA7
19. C. H. Anderson, E. S. Sabisky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 1049 (1970).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
20. D. V. Osborne, Proc. Phys. Soc. 80, 103 (1962); https://doi.org/PPSOAU
S. Putterman, Towards a Macroscopic Theory of Superfluids, PhD Thesis, Rockefeller University (1970).
21. W. E. Keller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 569 (1970).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
22. V. M. Kantorovich, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30, 805 (1956)
[V. M. Kantorovich, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 3, 770 (1956)].https://doi.org/ZETFA7
23. J. D. Reppy, C. T. Lane, Phys. Rev. 140, A106 (1965).

More about the Authors

Seth J. Putterman. University of California, Los Angeles.

Isadore Rudnick. University of California, Los Angeles.