Prospects for fusion power

APR 01, 1973

Some recent experimental results have given a clearer sense of direction and renewed optimism to research on controlled thermonuclear reactions.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3128016

Richard F. Post

The quest for fusion power began some forty years ago, with the discovery of nuclear fusion reactions, followed by the theory of thermonuclear processes, which successfully explained the source of the energy of the Sun and stars. But then, apart from the musings of a perceptive few, nearly twenty years passed before heightened interest in nuclear energy sources stimulated a serious attack on the problem. By this time both the potentialities of fusion and the growing need for energy from other than fossil‐fuel sources had become apparent. Here I shall try to evaluate the present state of research on controlled thermonuclear reactions in the context of the urgent need for developing new, environmentally acceptable, energy sources.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. D. J. Rose, M. Clark Jr, Plasmas and Controlled Fusion, MIT Press, Wiley, New York (1961);
R. F. Post, Ann. Rev. Nuclear Sci. 20, 509 (1970); https://doi.org/ARNUA8
N. A. Krall, A. W. Trivelpiece, Principles of Plasma Physics, McGraw Hill, N.Y. (1973).
2. L. A. Artsimovich and others, Proceedings of the Novosibirsk Conference, Vol. 1 Nuclear Fusion Special Supplement, IAEA, Vienna (1969) page 17.
3. E. M. Little, W. E. Quinn, G. A. Sawyer, Phys. Fluids 8, 1168 (1965); https://doi.org/PFLDAS
W. E. Quinn, E. M. Little, F. L. Ribe. G. A. Sawyer, Proceedings of the Culham Conference, Vol. 1, IAEA, Vienna (1965) page 237.
4. F. H. Coensgen and others, Proceedings of the Novosibirsk Conference, Vol. 2, IAEA, Vienna (1969), page 225.
5. D. Dimick and others, Proceedings of the Madison Conference, Vol. 1, IAEA, Vienna (1971) page 451.
6. N. C. Christofilos, Proceedings of the Salzburg Conference, Supplement, Part 1, IAEA, Vienna (1962) page 159;
N. C. Christofilos and others, Proceedings of the Madison Conference, Vol. 1, IAEA, Vienna (1971) page 119.
7. H. A. B. Bodin and others, Proceedings of the Novosibirsk Conference, Vol. 2, IAEA, Vienna (1969) page 533.
8. R. A. Dandl and others, Nuclear Fusion 4, 344 (1964); https://doi.org/NUFUAU
R. A. Dandl and others, Proceedings of the Madison Conference, Vol. 2, IAEA, Vienna (1971) page 607.
9. F. H. Coensgen and others, Proceedings of the Madison Conference, Vol. 2, IAEA, Vienna (1971) page 721.
10. T. Ohkawa, H. G. Voorhies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1275 (1969).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
11. B. B. Kadomtsev, O. P. Pogutse, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 24, 1172 (1969).https://doi.org/SPHJAR
12. M. N. Rosenbluth, R. F. Post, Phys. Fluids 8, 547 (1965); https://doi.org/PFLDAS
R. F. Post, M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Fluids 9, 730 (1966); https://doi.org/PFLDAS
D. E. Baldwin, J. E. Callen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1686 (1972); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
H. L. Berk, L. D. Pearlstein, Phys. Fluids 15, 891 (1972).https://doi.org/PFLDAS
13. H. A. B. Bodin and others, Proceedings of the Madison Conference, Vol. 1, IAEA, Vienna (1971) page 225;
R. S. Pease, J. Brit. Nuclear Energy Soc. 11, 165 (1972).
14. R. F. Post, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 232 (1967); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
B. G. Logan and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1435 (1972).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the Authors

Richard F. Post. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory.