Progress Toward a Tokamak Fusion Reactor

JAN 01, 1992

Tremendous advances have been made toward demonstrating the physics and technology required to develop magnetically confined deuterium‐tritium tokamak plasmas as an environmentally attractive energy source.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881337

J. Geoffrey Cordey

Robert J. Goldston

Ronald R. Parker

Nearly 90% of the world’s energy needs are today supplied by fossil fuels. Long‐term reliance on fossil‐fuel energy sources, however, is acknowledged to be a dangerous strategy—despite the large reserves of coal available in the US and elsewhere. Use of fossil fuels exacerbates pollution and acid rain and heightens the risk of global warming by adding ${CO}_{2}$ to the atmosphere. Society will be served best if energy production in the next century uses environmentally attractive methods that do not involve the combustion of fossil fuels. (See the article by John H. Gibbons and Peter D. Blair in PHYSICS TODAY, July 1991, page 22.) The long time required to develop and implement new large‐scale energy technologies—on the order of decades—underscores the urgency of the need to accelerate development of alternative energy sources.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. W. Fulkerson, R. R. Judkins, M. K. Sanghvi, Sci. Am., September 1990, p. 129.
2. A. P. Fickett, C. W. Gellings, A. B. Lovins, Sci. Am., September 1990, p. 65.
3. J. P. Holdren et al., report of the Senior Committee on Environment, Safety and Economic Aspects of Magnetic Fusion Energy (ESECOM), UCRL‐53766, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1989).
4. R. W. Conn et al., Nucl. Fusion 30, 1919 (1990).https://doi.org/NUFUAU
5. L. J. Wittenberg, J. F. Santarius, G. L. Kulcinski, Fusion Tech. 10, 167 (1986).
6. F. Najmabadi et al., “The ARIES‐I Tokamak Reactor Study,” report UCLA‐PPG‐1323, U. Calif., Los Angeles (1991).
7. R. J. Bickerton, J. W. Connor, J. B. Taylor, Nature (London) Phys. Sci. 229, 110 (1971).
A. A. Galeev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 59, 1378 (1970) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
[A. A. Galeev, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 752 (1971)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR
8. An excellent reference for the experimental results described in this article is the proceedings of the Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research Conferences from 1971 to 1990, Int. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
9. R. J. Goldston, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 26, 87 (1984).https://doi.org/PPCFET
10. J. W. Connor, J. B. Taylor, Nucl. Fusion 17, 1047 (1977).https://doi.org/NUFUAU
11. M. Keilhacker, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 29, 1401 (1987).https://doi.org/PPCFET
12. L. C. Bernard, F. J. Helton, R. W. Moore, T. N. Todd, Nucl. Fus. 23, 1475 (1983).
F. Troyon, R. Gruber, H. Saurenmann, S. Semenzato, S. Succi, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 26, 209 (1984). https://doi.org/PPCFET
A. Sykes, M. F. Turner, S. Patel, in Proc. Eleventh European Conf. on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, vol. 2, European Phys. Soc., Petit‐Lancy, Switzerland (1983), p. 363.
J. J. Ramos, Phys. Rev. A 42, 1021 (1990).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
13. B. Coppi, A. Ferreira, J. W.‐K. Mark, J. J. Ramos, Nucl. Fus 19, 715 (1979).
C. Mecier, in Plasma Phys. and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1978, vol. 1, Int. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1979) p. 701.
P. J. Fielding, F. A. Haas, ibid., p. 630.
D. Lortz, J. Nuhrenburg, Phys. Lett. A 68, 49 (1978).https://doi.org/PYLAAG
14. N. J. Fisch, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 175 (1987).https://doi.org/RMPHAT
15. Technical Planning Activity, Final Report, ANL/FPP‐87‐1, Argonne Natl. Lab., Argonne, Ill. (1987).
16. G. Stever et al., Fusion Policy Advisory Committee Final Report DOE (1990).

More about the Authors

J. Geoffrey Cordey. Joint European Torus, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.

Robert J. Goldston. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, New Jersey.

Ronald R. Parker. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.