Discover
/
Article

Probing the weak force with neutrinos

MAR 01, 1975
The study of high‐energy neutrino scattering is providing answers—some of them surprising—to some basic questions concerning the weak interactions.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3068874

David B. Cline
Alfred K. Mann
Carlo Rubbia

Interest in neutrino physics has surged up recently, partly because the “little neutral ones” are being groomed for the job (for which they alone are qualified) of probing the interiors of stars. Among elementary particles the neutrino is unique. This is because—as far as we know—it alone interacts with other particles only through the Fermi, or weak, interaction. In this article we will discuss how recent experiments, with new accelerators and detectors, such as the ones at CERN and Fermi Lab, have shed new light on some of the fundamental questions regarding the weak interactions. We will review the recent discoveries of neutral weak currents that conserve strangeness, parity violation and point‐like neutrino collisions, as well as some of the implications of these experiments to particle theory.

References

  1. 1. W. Pauli, Septième Conseil Solvay 1933, Gauthier‐Villars, Paris (1934).

  2. 2. E. Fermi, Z. Physik, 88, 161 (1934).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  3. 3. F. Reines, C. L. Cowan, Phys. Rev. 92, 830 (1953).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. B. Pontecorvo, JETP 37, 175 (1959).

  5. 5. M. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 306 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  6. 6. G. Danby, J. M. Gaillard, K. Goulianos, L. M. Lederman, N. Mistry, M. Schwartz, J. Steinberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 36 (1962).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  7. 7. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    A. Salam in Elementary Particle Physics (N. Svartholm, ed.) Almquist and Wiksells, Stockholm (1968) page 367.

  8. 8. T. D. Lee, PHYSICS TODAY, April 1972, page 23.

  9. 9. T. Eichten et al., Phys. Lett. B46, 274 (1973); https://doi.org/PYLBAJ
    A. Benvenuti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 800 (1974); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    B. Aubert et al., report submitted to the London Conference (1974).

  10. 10. B. Barish et al., report submitted to the London Conference (1974).

  11. 11. M. Derrick, ANL/HEP 7350 (1973).

  12. 12. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. 179, 1547 (1969).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  13. 13. G. Miller et al., Phys. Rev. D5, 528 (1972); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    A. Bodek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1087 (1973).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  14. 14. J. D. Bjorken, E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. 185, 1975 (1969).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  15. 15. J. Schechter, Y. Ueda, Phys. Rev. D2, 736 (1970).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  16. 16. S. S. Gerstein, Ia. B. Zel’dovich, JETP 2, 576 (1956);
    R. P. Feynman, M. Gell‐Mann, Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  17. 17. M. Gell‐Mann, Phys. Rev. 111, 362 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  18. 18. J. J. Sakurai, Annals of Physics 11, 1 (1960).https://doi.org/ANPYA2

  19. 19. B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 984 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  20. 20. U. Camerini, D. Cline, W. Fry, W. M. Powell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 318 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    M. Bott‐Bodenhausen et al., Phys. Lett. 24B, 194 (1967).https://doi.org/PYLBAJ

  21. 21. A. Clark et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1667 (1971); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    D. Cable et al., Phys. Rev. D8, 3807 (1973); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    D. Ljung, D. Cline, Phys. Rev. D8, 1307 (1973); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    R. J. Cence et al., Phys. Rev. D10, 776 (1974).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  22. 22. M. M. Block et al., Phys. Lett. 12, 281 (1964); https://doi.org/PHLTAM
    D. Cundy et al., Phys. Lett. 31B, 478 (1970).https://doi.org/PYLBAJ

  23. 23. F. J. Hasert et al., Phys. Lett. 46B, 138 (1973) https://doi.org/PYLBAJ
    and F. J. Hasert et al., Nucl. Phys. B73, 1 (1974).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  24. 24. A. Benvenuti et al., paper 288, Sixth International Symposium, Bonn (1973)
    and Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 800 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  25. 25. B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 1454 and (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  26. 26. S. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 448 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  27. 27. B. C. Barish et al., CIT‐FNAL report given at the London Conference, July 1974;
    W. Lee et al., report at the London Conference.

  28. 28. A. Litke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1189 (1973); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    B. Richter, invited talk at the University of California, Irvine, Conference, December 1973.

  29. 29. S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 255 (1974).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  30. 30. J. D. Bjorken, S. L. Glashow, Phys. Lett. 11, 255 (1964).https://doi.org/PHLTAM

  31. 31. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2, 1285 (1970).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  32. 32. M. Gell‐Mann, M. Goldberger, N. Kroll, F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. 179, 1518 (1969).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  33. 33. B. L. Ioffe, JETP 11, 1158 (1960).

More about the Authors

David B. Cline. Professor of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Alfred K. Mann. Professor of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Carlo Rubbia. Professor of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1975_03.jpeg

Volume 28, Number 3

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.