Probing Cosmic Mysteries by Supercomputer

OCT 01, 1996

Steady advances in supercomputing hardware and numerical algorithms are beginning to shed light on some of the most recalcitrant problems in astrophysics and cosmology

DOI: 10.1063/1.881523

Michael L. Norman

Astrophysicists have had a love affair with big computers since the dawn of the digital era. Although it is unlikely that the 1946 ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer) was ever used for astrophysical calculations, Princeton University astronomer Martin Schwarzschild made extensive use of the follow‐on MANIAC computer at the Los Alamos laboratory for his pioneering calculations of stellar evolution. Since World War II, simulating the inner workings of nuclear weapons has been one of the key applications driving the development of supercomputer technology. Because many of the same physical processes operate in stars and nebulae as in hydrogen bombs, supercomputers designed with defense needs in mind have been ideally suited to computational astrophysics research. Until the mid‐1980s, however, access to supercomputers was limited to a small cadre of researchers at defense laboratories or at a few specialized academic institutions.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. L. Mestel, L. SpitzerJr, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 116, 503 (1956).https://doi.org/MNRAA4
2. T. Mouschovias, in Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Media, A Ferrara, C. McKee, C. Heiles, P. Shapiro, eds., ASP Conf. Series Vol. 80, p. 184, Astron. Soc. of the Pacific, San Francisco (1995).
3. T. Mouschovias, L. SpitzerJr, Astrophys. J. 210, 326 (1976).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
4. R. Fiedler, T. Mouschovias, Astrophys. J. 415, 680 (1993).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
5. H. Bethe, J. Wilson, Astrophys. J. 295, 14 (1985).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
6. J. Wilson, in Numerical Astrophysics, J. Centrella, J. LeBlanc, R. Bowers, eds., Jones & Bartlett, Boston (1985), p. 422.
7. M. Herant, W. Benz, S. Colgate, Astrophys. J. 395, 642 (1992).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
8. A. Burrows, B. Fryxell, Science 258, 430 (1992). https://doi.org/SCIEAS
H. Janka, Astron. Astrophys. 256, 452 (1992).https://doi.org/AAEJAF
9. J. Ostriker, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 31, 689 (1993).https://doi.org/ARAAAJ
10. E. Bertschinger, J. Gelb, Comput. Phys. 5, 164 (1991).https://doi.org/CPHYE2
11. S. Gregory, L. Thompson, Astrophys. J. 222, 784 (1978). https://doi.org/ASJOAB
M. Geller, J. Huchra, Science 246, 897 (1989).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
12. M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C. Frenk, S. White, Nature 356, 489 (1992).https://doi.org/NATUAS
13. A. Evrard, F. Summers, M. Davis, Astrophys. J. 422, 11 (1994).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
14. R. Cen, J. Miralda‐Escude, J. Ostriker, M. Rauch, Astrophys. J. Lett. 437, 9 (1994).https://doi.org/AJLEAU
15. L. Hernquist, N. Katz, D. Weinberg, J. Miralda‐Escude, Astrophys J. Lett. 457, 51 (1996).https://doi.org/AJLEAU
16. Y. Zhang, A. Mieksin, P. Anninos, M. Norman, Univ. of Illinois preprint astro‐ph/9601130 (1996).

More about the authors

Michael L. Norman, Laboratory for Computational Astrophysics, National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign.