Discover
/
Article

Positron beams

FEB 01, 1969
These particles are now made with an intensity and energy approaching those of primary electron beams; their applications include scattering experiments, colliding‐beam experiments and annihilation photon production.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3035401

David E. Yount

POSITIVE ELECTRONS, which offer interesting comparisons with negative electrons and can be a useful source of photons, may be made by pair production in a target placed in the electron path of a linear accelerator. Greater intensity can be achieved by acceleration, by a coaxial solenoid, with magnetic quadrupoles or by a solenoid‐quadrupole combination. One important application of these positron beams is the production of “tertiary” beams of annihilation photons that can provide a partially monochromatic photon beam. Other applications include positron‐proton and electron‐proton scattering comparisons and colliding‐beam experiments in which electrons are injected at high energies into storage rings.

References

  1. 1. R. B. Neal, PHYSICS TODAY 20, no. 4, 27 (1967).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  2. 2. J. A. Poirier, D. M. Bernstein, J. Pine, Phys. Rev. 117, 557 (1960).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. D. Yount, J. Pine, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 15, 45 (1962).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  4. 4. D. Yount, J. Pine, Phys. Rev. 128, 1842 (1962).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  5. 5. A. Browman, F. Liu, C. Schaerf, Phys. Rev. 139, B1079 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  6. 6. R. L. Anderson, B. Borgia, G. L. Cassidy, J. W. DeWire, A. S. Ito, E. C. Loh, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 407 (1966).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  7. 7. A. DeHollan, E. Engels, B. Knapp, L. Hand, Proceedings of the XIIIth International Conference on High‐Energy Physics, Berkeley (1966).

  8. 8. W. Bartel, B. Dudelzak, H. Krehbiel, J. M. McElroy, R. J. Morrison, W. Schmidt, V. Walther, G. Weber, DESY 67/22 (1967).

  9. 9. B. Bouquet, D. Benaksas, B. Grossetète, B. Jean‐Marie, G. Parrour, J. P. Poux, R. Tchapoutian, Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire Report LAL 1183 (1967).

  10. 10. J. Mar, B. C. Barish, J. Pine, D. H. Coward, H. DeStaebler, J. Litt, A. Minten, R. E. Taylor, M. Breidenbach, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 13, no. 4, 636 (1968); https://doi.org/BAPSA6
    J. Mar, B. C. Barish, J. Pine, D. H. Coward, H. DeStaebler, J. Litt, A. Minten, R. E. Taylor, M. Breidenbach, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 482 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  11. 11. J. Goldemberg, J. Pine, D. Yount, Phys. Rev. 132, 406 (1963).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  12. 12. A. Browman, B. Grossetète, D. Yount, Phys. Rev. 143, 899 (1966).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  13. 13. A. Browman, B. Grossetète, D. Yount, Phys. Rev. 151, 1094 (1966).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  14. 14. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electron and Positron Storage Rings, Saclay, France, 26–30 September 1966.

  15. 15. C. S. Nunan, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐12, no. 3, 465 (June 1965).https://doi.org/IETNAE

  16. 16. J. T. Caldwell, R. R. Harvey, R. L. Bramblett, S. C. Fultz, Phys. Letters 6, 213 (1963). https://doi.org/PHLTAM
    S. C. Fultz et al., Phys. Rev. 127, 1273 (1962); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    S. C. Fultz et al., Phys. Rev. 128, 2345 (1962).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  17. 17. PHYSICS TODAY 21, no. 5, 77 (1968).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  18. 18. J. Miller, C. Schuhl, G. Tamas, C. Tzara, in “Contributions to the Karlsruhe Photonuclear Conference,” Karlsruhe, Germany, 18–22 August 1960.

  19. 19. H. Brechna, K. E. Breymayer, K. G. Garney, H. DeStaebler, R. H. Heln, C. T. Hoard, in The Stanford Two‐Mile Accelerator, R. B. Neal, ed., W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, (1968).

  20. 20. J. Ballam, G. Chadwick, Z. Guiragossián, D. Leith, R. R. Larsen, S. Williams, “The SLAC Monochromatic Photon Beam,” to be published.

More about the Authors

David E. Yount. SLAC.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_02.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 2

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.