Physics of Electrophotography

MAY 01, 1986

Our knowledge of the physics underlying this printing and copying technology has advanced considerably since its invention 48 years ago, but there are still important areas in which the principles are incompletely understood.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881026

Donald M. Burland

Lawrence B. Schein

Electrophotographic printing and copying systems are based on two wellknown but not well‐understood physical phenomena: electrostatic charging and photoconductivity. That some materials can acquire an electric charge by contact or rubbing has been known at least since the time of Thales of Miletus, around 600 B.C., and much work has been done on understanding the phenomenology of the effect, particularly in the 18th and 19th centuries; nevertheless the underlying physics of electrostatic charging of insulators remains unclear. Photoconductivity is a considerably more recent discovery, dating back only to 1873, when Willoughby Smith discovered the effect in selenium. Early work concentrated on crystalline covalent solids; only recently has the photoconductivity of highly insulating amorphous materials been studied. In fact the invention of electrophotography was a major catalyst to research in both electrostatic charging and photoconductivity.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. Standard references in the field include: R. M. Shaffert, Electrophotography, Focal, London (1980);
J. H. Dessauer, H. E. Clark, Xerography, Focal, London (1965).
2. More recent books are: E. M. Williams, The Physics and Technology of Xerographic Processes, Wiley, New York (1984);
M. Scharfe, Electrophotography Principles and Optimization, Wiley, New York (1984).
3. L. B. Schein, Photogr. Sci. Eng. 19, 255 (1975). https://doi.org/PSENAC
L. B. Schein, K. J. Fowler, J. Imaging Technol. 11, 295 (1985).https://doi.org/JITEEU
4. W. R. Harper, Contact and Frictional Electrification, Clarendon, Oxford (1967), p. 234.
5. J. Lowell, A. C. Rose‐Innes, Adv. Phys. 29, 947 (1980).https://doi.org/ADPHAH
6. T. J. Fabish, C. B. Duke, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 4256 (1977).https://doi.org/JAPIAU
7. G. A. Cottrell, J. Lowell, A. C. Rose‐Innes, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 374 (1979).https://doi.org/JAPIAU
8. J. Henniker, Nature 196, 474 (1962).https://doi.org/NATUAS
9. G. Pfister, H. Scher, Adv. Phys. 27, 747 (1978). https://doi.org/ADPHAH
J. Mort, G. Pfister, in Electronic Properties of Polymers, J. Mort, G. Pfister, eds., Wiley, New York (1982).
H. Bässler, Phys. Status Solidi B 107, 9 (1981).https://doi.org/PSSBBD
10. H. Bässler, Philos. Mag. B 50, 347 (1984).https://doi.org/PMABDJ
11. W. D. Gill, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 5033 (1972).https://doi.org/JAPIAU
12. M. Stolka, J. F. Yanus, D. M. Pai, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 4707 (1984).https://doi.org/JPCHAX

More about the authors

Donald M. Burland, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California.

Lawrence B. Schein, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California.